STAGING OF PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND

被引:27
|
作者
ROSCH, T
DITTLER, HJ
LORENZ, R
BRAIG, C
GAIN, T
FEUERBACH, S
HOFLER, H
SIEWERT, JR
CLASSEN, M
机构
[1] TECH UNIV MUNICH, KLINIKUM RECHTS ISAR, CHIRURG KLIN & POLIKLIN, W-8000 MUNICH 80, GERMANY
[2] TECH UNIV MUNICH, KLINIKUM RECHTS ISAR, INST RONTGENDIAGNOST, W-8000 MUNICH 80, GERMANY
[3] TECH UNIV MUNICH, KLINIKUM RECHTS ISAR, INST ALLGEMEINE PATHOL & PATHOL ANAT, W-8000 MUNICH 80, GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2008-1062347
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), conventional ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and angiography were compared in their assessment of local resectability in 35 consecutive patients (19 men, 16 women; mean age 49.8 [42-821] years) with non-metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas. The findings were made prospectively and independently of each other. EUS proved to be superior to transabdominal US and to CT in the diagnosis of tumour infiltration of the portal and splenic veins. For the portal vein the sensitivity was 93% by EUS, 14% by US and 36% by CT. Corresponding figures for the splenic vein were 92%, 39% and 69%. EUS was markedly superior to angiography in the diagnosis of portal vein involvement (sensitivity of 93% and 36%, respectively), but the two methods had similar sensitivity regarding splenic vein infiltration (92 and 100%). Tumour involvement of the coeliac trunk was diagnosed with higher sensitivity angiographically (86%) than by EUS (57%). CT (71%) or US (29%). Regarding T and N staging. EUS was superior to both US and CT. These data indicate that EUS is the most accurate method for local tumour staging of potentially resectable pancreatic carcinoma. It can replace angiography in the diagnosis of portal vein infiltration.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 569
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA
    KELLY, DM
    BENJAMIN, IS
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1995, 6 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [22] PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA
    LIVINGSTON, EH
    REBER, HA
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 9 (05) : 780 - 786
  • [23] PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA
    KLAMER, TW
    MAX, MH
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 75 (07) : 780 - 782
  • [24] PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA
    HUGUIER, M
    GAZETTE MEDICALE, 1990, 97 (40): : 57 - 61
  • [25] PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA
    WARSHAW, AL
    FERNANDEZDELCASTILLO, C
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (07): : 455 - 465
  • [26] PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA
    HERFARTH, C
    LEHNERT, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (01) : 18 - 20
  • [27] PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA
    ECKHAUSER, FE
    COLLETTI, LM
    KNOL, JA
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 11 (05) : 414 - 422
  • [28] Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) staging in patients with pancreatic carcinoma versus patients with pancreatic carcinoma in the background of chronic pancreatitis.
    Ciaccia, D
    Imperiale, T
    Al-Assi, M
    Kiel, J
    Sherman, S
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (04) : AB145 - AB145
  • [29] Staging of pancreatic carcinoma - Is endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) still the best staging tool when compared to helical CT?
    Becker, D
    Braun, T
    Strobel, DD
    Lenz, M
    Hahn, EG
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (04) : AB86 - AB86
  • [30] Endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma
    Zhang, X
    Watson, DI
    Lally, C
    Bessell, JR
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (12): : 1618 - 1621