TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM, INSTITUTIONS OF TECHNOLOGY HIGHER EDUCATION: QUALITY GUIDELINES

被引:0
|
作者
Parada Romero, Laura Belkis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Militar Nueva Granada, Educ, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
teacher evaluation; technology assessment; educational quality guidelines;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Due to the globalization of education, it has become prevalent to strengthen the quality systems to ensure that educational actors in higher education institutions are the best. In this context teachers are given a main role since they are cornerstones in educational processes. Currently, teacher quality is assessed through an assessment or evaluation system. Almost every university evaluates its teachers, but there is no legal regulation on how to do it; in most institutions there is a professional in charge of designing and applying assessment instruments according to the authors he/she prefers. In most universities, on the one hand, it is used a traditional questionnaire aiming to collect data about dimensions associated with teaching; on the other hand, there is another option in which assessment models include self-evaluation, as in some cases in Chile. That's why one of the concerns of this research is to propose guidelines for a more qualitative and formative assessment not exclusively following political parameters - based on administrative decisions-, but following emerging proposals with a deeper analysis. Nowadays the main actors in teacher evaluation are teachers, students and administrative staff; every six months these actors are evaluated by using an assessment tool that they usually do not know. The research investigates the perception actors in teacher evaluation have regarding its objectives, methods and stages, so they put forward ideas on how to restructure the current institutional assessment and propose improvements aiming at both the quantitative aspect and the qualitative analysis of performances and skills.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 198
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Teacher Training Satisfaction: A Critical Factor for Technology Integration in Higher Education
    Batista, Sofia
    Pedro, Neuza
    Agonacs, Nikoletta
    Fonte, Magda
    Oliveira, Nuno
    Matos, Joao Filipe
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING (ECEL 2017), 2017, : 580 - 584
  • [32] TEACHER PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Bravo, Tomasa Veronica Cajas
    Infantes, Manuel Silva
    Moran, Roberto Carlos Davila
    REVISTA CONRADO, 2023, 19 (90): : 326 - 335
  • [33] Students as Stakeholders in the Policy Context of the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education Institutions
    Logermann, Frauke
    Leisyte, Liudvika
    EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA: BETWEEN CRITICAL REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE POLICIES, PTS 1-2, 2015, : 685 - 701
  • [34] An evaluation of the impact of confinement on the quality of e-learning in higher education institutions
    Rughoobur-Seetah, Soujata
    Hosanoo, Zuberia Aminah
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2021, 29 (04) : 422 - 444
  • [35] The quality of communication in Higher Education Institutions of Ecuador
    Santa-Maria, Guillermo
    Rey-Martin, Carina
    Molina-Benavides, Lilian
    Clery, Arturo
    INVESTIGACION BIBLIOTECOLOGICA, 2019, 33 (81): : 13 - 39
  • [36] Communication of the Quality of Higher Education Institutions of Ecuador
    Santa Maria, Guillermo
    Rey, Carina
    Molina, Lilian
    Clery, Arturo
    DEVELOPMENTS AND ADVANCES IN DEFENSE AND SECURITY, 2020, 152 : 487 - 495
  • [37] Quality assurance systems in higher education institutions
    Rios de Deus, Ma Paula
    REVISTA ELECTRONICA INTERUNIVERSITARIA DE FORMACION DEL PROFESORADO, 2014, 17 (03): : 21 - 38
  • [38] QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN LATVIA
    Stefenhagena, Dita
    Bariss, Voldemars
    NEW DIMENSIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY HOME ECONOMICS FINANCE AND TAXES, 2017, (46): : 173 - 179
  • [39] The quality of teaching staff: higher education institutions’ compliance with the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance—the case of Portugal
    Sónia Cardoso
    Orlanda Tavares
    Cristina Sin
    Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2015, 27 : 205 - 222
  • [40] Supporting quality research in institutions of higher education
    Harman, G
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 1998, 42 (03) : 285 - 302