Corporate board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility reporting in Malaysia

被引:23
|
作者
Ahmad, Nurulyasmin Binti Ju [1 ]
Rashid, Afzalur [1 ]
Gow, Jeff [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Queensland, Sch Commerce, West St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Stellenbosch, South Africa
来源
GENDER TECHNOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT | 2018年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; board diversity; resource dependence theory; Malaysia;
D O I
10.1080/09718524.2018.1496671
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study aims to examine the impact of board gender diversity on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting by public listed companies of Bursa Malaysia over the period 2008-2013. Content analysis was used to determine the extent of CSR reporting. A reporting level index consisting of 51 items was developed based on six themes: General, Community, Environment, Human Resources, Marketplace, and Other. An ordinary least square regression was employed to determine the association between both gender diversity and educational background, and CSR reporting. The results reveal that the proportion of female directors and directors' educational background are not associated with CSR reporting levels. The findings are consistent with the critical mass theory which argues that a mass of three or more women can cause a fundamental change in boardroom dynamics. As representation of women on corporate boards in Malaysia is very limited at this moment, regulators and policymakers should be more stringent in monitoring board diversity. On the whole, this study proposes that a well-managed diversity contributes to an effective board, thus serving to safeguard all stakeholders' interests. This study provides new insights and contributes to the literature on the practices of boardroom diversity and corporate social responsibility reporting in the context of a semi-developed country.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:87 / 108
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corporate social responsibility reporting quality, board characteristics and corporate social reputation Evidence from China
    Lu, Yingjun
    Abeysekera, Indra
    Cortese, Corinne
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 27 (01) : 95 - 118
  • [32] Board gender diversity, corporate social commitment and sustainability
    Arayakarnkul, Pochara
    Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn
    Treepongkaruna, Sirimon
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (05) : 1706 - 1721
  • [33] Board diversity and corporate social responsibility disclosure of multinational corporations
    Peng, Xuhui
    Yang, Zhihan
    Shao, Jingjing
    Li, Xue
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (42) : 4884 - 4898
  • [34] Gender Mainstreaming and Corporate Social Responsibility: Reporting Workplace Issues
    Kate Grosser
    Jeremy Moon
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, 62 : 327 - 340
  • [35] Gender mainstreaming and corporate social responsibility: Reporting workplace issues
    Grosser, K
    Moon, J
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 62 (04) : 327 - 340
  • [36] Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures and Board Structure: Evidence from Malaysia
    Razak, Shazrul Ekhmar Abdul
    Mustapha, Mazlina
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2013, 64 (03):
  • [37] Corporate Governance as a Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Determinant
    Tapver, Triinu
    EURASIAN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 15 (01): : 113 - 128
  • [38] Impact of Board Gender Diversity on Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility: Empirical Evidence from France
    Boukattaya, Sonia
    Omri, Abdelwahed
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [39] The moderating effect of board gender diversity on the relation between corporate social responsibility and firm value
    Yunyi Li
    Charl de Villiers
    Lina Zixuan Li
    Leye Li
    Journal of Management Control, 2022, 33 : 109 - 143
  • [40] The moderating effect of board gender diversity on the relation between corporate social responsibility and firm value
    Li, Yunyi
    de Villiers, Charl
    Li, Lina Zixuan
    Li, Leye
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT CONTROL, 2022, 33 (01) : 109 - 143