STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF THE AGDISP MODEL WITH DEPOSIT DATA

被引:5
|
作者
DUAN, BZ
YENDOL, WG
MIERZEJEWSKI, K
机构
[1] Pesticide Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
来源
关键词
AGDISP MODEL EVALUATION; BACILLUS-THURINGIENSIS; AERIAL SPRAYING; FORESTRY;
D O I
10.1016/0960-1686(92)90062-P
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An aerial spray Agricultural Dispersal (AGDISP) model was tested against quantitative field data. The microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) was sprayed as fine spray from a helicopter over a flat site in various meteorological conditions. Droplet deposition on evenly spaced Kromekote cards, 0.15 m above the ground, was measured with image analysis equipment. Six complete data sets out of the 12 trials were selected for data comparison. A set of statistical parameters suggested by the American Meteorological Society and other authors was applied for comparisons of the model prediction with the ground deposit data. The results indicated that AGDISP tended to overpredict the average volume deposition by a factor of two. The sensitivity test of the AGDISP model to the input wind direction showed that the model may not be sensitive to variations in wind direction within 10 degrees relative to aircraft flight path.
引用
收藏
页码:1635 / 1642
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling agricultural spray drift using a coupled CALPUFF-AGDISP model
    DesAutels, Christopher
    Ma, Qingli
    Popovic, Jelena
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252
  • [32] Data-Driven Synthesis of a Geometallurgical Model for a Copper Deposit
    Mu, Yuyang
    Salas, Juan Carlos
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [33] Faster big data searching by utilizing the statistical model of the data
    Shibuya, Tetsuo
    Journal of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, 2014, 97 (05): : 384 - 387
  • [34] A comparison of statistical methods for fitting population models to data
    Wade, PR
    MARINE MAMMAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT METHODS, 1999, : 249 - 270
  • [35] Comparison of Statistical Tests and Power Analysis for Phosphoproteomics Data
    Ding, Lei J.
    Schluter, Hannah M.
    Szucs, Matthew J.
    Ahmad, Rushdy
    Wu, Zheyang
    Xu, Weifeng
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2020, 19 (02) : 572 - 582
  • [36] A Statistical Comparison of Classification Algorithms on a Single Data Set
    Sibona, Christopher
    Brickey, Jonalan
    AMCIS 2012 PROCEEDINGS, 2012,
  • [37] STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS FOR METHOD COMPARISON DATA - REPLY
    SOUCHEK, J
    ELMAGHRABY, A
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 111 (05) : 583 - 583
  • [38] Comparison of methods for the estimation of statistical parameters of censored data
    Kuttatharmmakul, S
    Massart, DL
    Coomans, D
    Smeyers-Verbeke, J
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2001, 441 (02) : 215 - 229
  • [39] A comparison study of statistical methods for the analysis metagenome data
    Lee, Chanyoung
    Lee, Seungyeoun
    Park, Taesung
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2017, : 1777 - 1781
  • [40] An alternative statistical approach for interlaboratory comparison data evaluation
    Lin, ZC
    Inn, KGW
    Filliben, JJ
    JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2001, 248 (01) : 163 - 173