Sensitive Research and the Collision of Advocacy and Research: Consequences for the Researcher

被引:0
|
作者
Stewart, Mary White [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Sch Social Res & Justice Studies, Reno, NV 89557 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH PRACTICE | 2016年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
battered women; sensitive research; advocacy; research ethics; imposter syndrome; researcher vulnerabilities; second-order narrative;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Doing sensitive research presents particular problems over and above other social science research because of the nature of the issues being asked about and their potential impact on both the participant and the researcher. In some instances, the factors that engage the researcher in the project may also be of interest to advocates who are working for the benefit of the participants in the research. In the current instance, the researcher was interested in understanding the impact of "life without" the possibility of parole on the lives of women convicted of killing their abusers, as well as the impact of their imprisonment and clemency on their families. At the same time, a powerful advocacy group was devoted to gaining clemency for the women. The resulting clash between the goals and purposes of these two entities resulted in a significant impasse and unanticipated consequences for the research agenda as well as the researcher. Analysis of one specific research project and the problems resulting from the clash between researcher and advocates can contribute to the literature on sensitive research as well as on the clashes between advocacy and social science research.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement
    Forsythe, Laura P.
    Frank, Lori B.
    Workman, Thomas A.
    Borsky, Amanda
    Hilliard, Tandrea
    Harwell, Daniel
    Fayish, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (03) : 245 - 256
  • [32] Is research the new advocacy? Mobilising social science research through 'solutions-focused advocacy'
    Schwan, Kaitlin
    Nichols, Naomi
    Malenfant, Jayne
    JOURNAL OF POVERTY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2023, 31 (01): : 128 - 145
  • [33] Collision avoidance research
    Birch, S
    AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 1996, 16 (08) : 28 - 28
  • [34] Foucault and Research Ethics: On the Autonomy of the Researcher
    Hammersley, Martyn
    Traianou, Anna
    QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2014, 20 (03) : 227 - 238
  • [35] Rethinking researcher bias in health research
    Buetow, Stephen
    Zawaly, Kristina
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (05) : 843 - 846
  • [36] Introduction: why patients in research? The researcher
    Schenea, A. H.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2016, 18 : 49 - 50
  • [37] Efficiency of research performance and the glass researcher
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Haunschild, Robin
    JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (02) : 652 - 654
  • [38] In the eye of the beholder: The researcher in qualitative research
    Hasselkus, BR
    OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1997, 17 (02): : 81 - 83
  • [39] The Wounded Researcher: Research with Soul in Mind
    Schenk, Ronald
    JUNG JOURNAL-CULTURE & PSYCHE, 2008, 2 (02) : 101 - 110
  • [40] Research identities: Reflections of a contract researcher
    Goode, Jackie
    SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2006, 11 (02):