Solving the ocean color inverse problem by using evolutionary multi-objective optimization of neuro-fuzzy systems

被引:6
|
作者
Cococcioni, Marco [1 ]
Corsini, Giovanni [1 ]
Lazzerini, Beatrice [1 ]
Marcelloni, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Ingn Informaz Elettron, Informat, Telecomunicaz, Via Diotisalvi 2, I-56122 Pisa, Italy
关键词
Ocean color; Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS); multi-objective evolutionary algorithms; fuzzy rule-based systems; Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models; Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS); (2+2) Modified-Pareto Archived Evolutionary Strategy ((2+2)M-PAES);
D O I
10.3233/KES-2008-125-604
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The ocean color inverse problem consists of determining the concentrations of optically active constituents, such as chlorophyll, suspended particulate matter and colored dissolved organic matter, from remotely sensed multispectral measurements of the reflected sunlight back-scattered by the water body. In this paper, we approach this regression problem by using an evolutionary multi-objective algorithm, namely the (2+2) Modified Pareto Archived Evolutionary Strategy ((2+2)M-PAES), to optimize Takagi-Sugeno type (TS-type) fuzzy rule-based systems (FRBSs). Accuracy and complexity are the two competitive objectives to be simultaneously optimized. TS-type FRBSs are implemented as an artificial neural network; by training the neural network, the parameters of the fuzzy model are adjusted. In this way, the evolutionary optimization coarsely identifies the structure of the TS-type FRBSs, while the corresponding neural networks finely tune their parameters. As a result, a set of TS-type FRBSs with different trade-offs between accuracy and complexity is provided at the end of the optimization process. We show the effectiveness of our approach by comparing our results with those obtained on the ocean color inverse problem by other techniques recently proposed in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 355
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Solving Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Problems with Evolutionary Algorithms
    Snyman, Frikkie
    Helbig, Marde
    ADVANCES IN SWARM INTELLIGENCE, ICSI 2017, PT II, 2017, 10386 : 57 - 66
  • [43] Solving multi-objective optimization problems by a bi-objective evolutionary algorithm
    Wang, Yu-Ping
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 1018 - 1024
  • [44] A Cascaded Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization for Solving the Unbiased Universal Electric Motor Family Problem
    Friedrich, Timo
    Menzel, Stefan
    2014 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2014, : 3184 - 3191
  • [45] Solving Vehicle Routing Problem with Stochastic Demand Using Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm
    Jiang, Jing
    Gee, Sen Bong
    Arokiasami, Willson Amalraj
    Tan, Kay Chen
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING & MACHINE INTELLIGENCE ISCMI 2014, 2014, : 121 - 125
  • [46] Solving the aircraft engine maintenance scheduling problem using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
    Kleeman, MP
    Lamont, GB
    EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 3410 : 782 - 796
  • [47] A New Formulation and Solving of Protective Relays Setting and Coordination Problem Using Multi-objective Optimization and Fuzzy Logic
    Benahid, Rahah
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING, IDENTIFICATION & CONTROL (ICMIC 2016), 2016, : 138 - 143
  • [48] A new technique for solving the multi-objective optimization problem using hybrid approach
    Younes M.
    Fouad K.
    Bagdad B.
    Frontiers in Energy, 2014, 8 (4) : 490 - 503
  • [49] A new technique for solving the multi-objective optimization problem using hybrid approach
    Mimoun YOUNES
    Khodja FOUAD
    Belabbes BAGDAD
    Frontiers in Energy, 2014, 8 (04) : 490 - 503
  • [50] Fuzzy optimization with multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a case study
    Sanchez, G.
    Jimenez, F.
    Vasant, P.
    2007 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING, 2007, : 58 - +