COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A MILK PRODUCTION SYSTEM WITH CROSSBRED ANIMALS IN NORTHERN MINAS GERAIS

被引:2
|
作者
Costa, M. D. [1 ]
Ruas, J. M. N. [1 ,2 ]
Martins Neto, T. [1 ]
Rodriguez, M. A. P. [1 ]
Venturin, R. P. [3 ]
Mendes, L. J. [1 ]
Gomes, W. F. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Montes Claros, Janauba, MG, Brazil
[2] Empresa Pesquisa Agr Minas Gerais, Janauba, MG, Brazil
[3] Zootecnista Autonomo, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil
来源
BOLETIM DE INDUSTRIA ANIMAL | 2016年 / 73卷 / 03期
关键词
economic analysis; profitability; dairy cows;
D O I
10.17523/bia.v73n3p244
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A simulation study was conducted to estimate the production costs of animals with different proportions of Holstein genes and annual return per cow in a herd from the northern region of Minas Gerais. Data from the zootechnical archive of Fazenda Queluz, Francisco Sa, MG, Brazil, comprising the period from 2007 to 2012 were used. The production system consists of crossbred Holstein x Zebu (HZ) cows with a genetic composition ranging from 1/4 HZ to 7/8 HZ. Total revenue per animal, annual profit per cow and variation in profitability were estimated over the years according to genetic composition. The revenue from milk production was greater for 7/8 HZ cows, but the estimated annual profit per cow was only 7.75% of total revenue, followed by 3/4 HZ cows which also exhibited low profit (4.11%). The highest profit was observed for 3/8 HZ cows, followed by 1/4 HZ and 1/2 HZ animals. Inversion of the genetic composition of the herd was observed over the years. In 2007, 64% of cows of the herd were 7/8 HZ, while in 2012, 7/8 HZ cows had been replaced with 1/4 HZ, 3/8 HZ and 1/2 HZ animals, accounting for 90% of all genotypes. Despite the greater production of animals with a higher proportion of Holstein genes, the change to cows with a higher proportion of genes of dairy Zebu breeds increased profitability, a fact that might be attributed to the greater economic efficiency of this genotype.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 251
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cognition and cost-benefit analysis
    Sunstein, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 1059 - 1103
  • [32] EQUITY IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    PEARCE, DW
    WISE, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1972, 6 (03) : 324 - 325
  • [33] Financial cost-benefit analysis of soil conservation practices in northern Thailand
    Renaud, F
    [J]. MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 17 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [34] Cost-benefit analysis and the environment
    Sunstein, CR
    [J]. ETHICS, 2005, 115 (02) : 351 - 385
  • [35] Cost-benefit analysis of the RFA
    Dovich, Norman J.
    Soper, Steven A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 314 (5806) : 1682 - 1682
  • [36] UNEMPLOYMENT AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BAXTER, ND
    HOWREY, EP
    PENNER, RG
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE, 1969, 24 (01): : 80 - 88
  • [37] THEORY OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    JONES, CR
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1968, 6 (04): : 333 - 333
  • [38] The discipline of cost-benefit analysis
    Sen, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 931 - 952
  • [39] Rethinking cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, MD
    Posner, EA
    [J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1999, 109 (02): : 165 - +
  • [40] Is cost-benefit analysis for everyone?
    Sunstein, CR
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2001, 53 (01) : 299 - 314