Bid, delivery, legacy - creating the governance architecture of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games legacy

被引:7
|
作者
Brown, Richard [1 ]
Cox, Gary [2 ]
Owens, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] London Legacy Dev Corp Personal Capac, London, England
[2] Publ Policy, Res & Strategy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Michael Owens Associates, London, England
关键词
urban regeneration; urban renewal; Olympic Games; legacy; urban governance; London; 2012; Mayor of London; planning history;
D O I
10.1080/07293682.2012.706964
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The regeneration legacy was the cornerstone of the London bid for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. It became a powerful rationale for hosting the Games, justifying major investment into the Lower Lea Valley in East London that would flow from a successful bid. This article provides a historical account of the development and delivery of the London 2012 Games as a regeneration program. It focuses on the strategic development of delivery vehicles and governance arrangements, tracking through the development of the organisational structure of the 2012 Games. The account follows three stages: (i) making the bid, (ii) delivering the Games, and (iii) establishing the legacy. The article concludes by offering some insights into the success of the London 2012 delivery to date and some tentative learning points about effective planning for the legacy. Cities should give early consideration to establishing robust and empowered legacy delivery structures. This will ensure that a powerful advocate for legacy interests is in place at the earliest possible stage. It will also drive forward delivery when the 'deadline imperative' of the Olympic and Paralympic Games is no longer there.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 238
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games: public health surveillance and epidemiology
    McCloskey, Brian
    Endericks, Tina
    Catchpole, Mike
    Zambon, Maria
    McLauchlin, Jim
    Shetty, Nandini
    Manuel, Rohini
    Turbitt, Deborah
    Smith, Gillian
    Crook, Paul
    Severi, Ettore
    Jones, Jane
    Ibbotson, Sue
    Marshall, Roberta
    Smallwood, Catherine A. H.
    Isla, Nicolas
    Memish, Ziad A.
    Al-Rabeeah, Abdullah A.
    Barbeschi, Maurizio
    Heymann, David L.
    Zumla, Alimuddin
    [J]. LANCET, 2014, 383 (9934): : 2083 - 2089
  • [32] Beyond Olympic Legacy: Understanding Paralympic Legacy Through a Thematic Analysis
    Misener, Laura
    Darcy, Simon
    Legg, David
    Gilbert, Keith
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (04) : 329 - 341
  • [33] The Olympic legacy:Feeding London
    Janssens, Freek
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGY TODAY, 2012, 28 (04) : 1 - 2
  • [34] Olympic Housing: A Critical Review of London 2012's Legacy
    Cox, Gary
    [J]. HOUSING THEORY & SOCIETY, 2015, 32 (02): : 242 - 244
  • [35] Olympic housing: a critical review of London 2012's legacy
    Sagoe, Cecil
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOUSING POLICY, 2016, 16 (04): : 556 - 558
  • [36] Towards an Olympic volunteering legacy: motivating volunteers to serve and remain - a case study of London 2012 Olympic Games volunteers
    Koutrou, Niki
    Pappous, Athanasios
    [J]. VOLUNTARY SECTOR REVIEW, 2016, 7 (03): : 269 - 291
  • [37] Olympic Housing: A Critical Review of London 2012's Legacy
    Doucet, Brian
    [J]. HOUSING STUDIES, 2015, 30 (03) : 504 - 505
  • [38] Olympic housing: a critical review of London 2012's legacy
    Clark, Julie
    [J]. PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 30 (03) : 471 - 473
  • [39] Olympic housing: a critical review of London 2012's legacy
    Engineer, Altaf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOURISM AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2017, 15 (01) : 99 - 101
  • [40] Olympic Games: No legacy for sports
    Contreras, Jose L.
    Corvalan, Alejandro
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 122 (02) : 268 - 271