MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF DAMAGED TRABECULAR BONE

被引:86
|
作者
KEAVENY, TM
WACHTEL, EF
GUO, XE
HAYES, WC
机构
[1] BETH ISRAEL HOSP,CHARLES A DANA RES INST,DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG,ORTHOPAED BIOMECH LAB,BOSTON,MA 02215
[2] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,BOSTON,MA 02215
[3] HARVARD UNIV,DIV APPL SCI,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02139
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0021-9290(94)90040-X
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The mechanical behavior of damaged trabecular bone may play a role in the etiology of age-related spine fractures since damaged bone exists in and may weaken the elderly vertebral body. To describe some characteristics of damaged trabecular bone, we measured the changes in modulus and strength that occur when bovine trabecular bone is loaded in compression to various strains beyond its elastic range. Twenty-three reduced-section specimens, taken from 17 different bones, were loaded from 0-X-0-9% strain, where X was one of four strains: 1.0% (n = 7), 2.5% (n = 6), 4.0% (n = 5), or 5.5% (n = 5). We found that modulus was reduced for all applied strains, whereas strength was reduced only for strain levels greater than or equal to 2.5%; the percentage changes in modulus and strength were independent of Young's modulus but were highly dependent on the magnitude of the applied strains; modulus was always reduced more than strength; and simple statistical models, using knowledge of only the applied strains, predicted well the percentage reductions in modulus (r(2) = 0.97) and strength (r(2) = 0.74). The modulus reductions reported here are in qualitative agreement with those for cortical bone in tensile loading, supporting the concept that the damage behaviors of cortical and trabecular bone are similar for low strains (less than or equal to 4.0%). In addition, because modulus was always reduced more than strength, damaged trabecular bone may be stress protected in vivo by redistribution of stresses to undamaged bone.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1318
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR WITH RESPECT TO SUPERPLASTICITY
    TROOST, A
    ELMAGD, E
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1977, 28 (02): : 201 - 207
  • [32] MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR AND STRUCTURE OF ROCKS
    HOUPERT, R
    HOMANDETIENNE, F
    JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY, 1985, 29 (02) : 235 - 235
  • [33] MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF POLYOLEFIN BLENDS
    KESARI, J
    SALOVEY, R
    ADVANCES IN CHEMISTRY SERIES, 1984, (206): : 211 - 219
  • [34] MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF FERROELECTRIC CERAMICS
    OKAZAKI, K
    AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1984, 63 (09): : 1150 - &
  • [35] MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF CERAMIC CAPACITORS
    KORIPELLA, CR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS HYBRIDS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 14 (04): : 718 - 724
  • [36] MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF GRADIENT POLYMERS
    MARTIN, GC
    ENSSANI, E
    SHEN, M
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1981, 26 (05) : 1465 - 1473
  • [37] THE MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF THE PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT
    VANEIJDEN, TMGJ
    ACTA MORPHOLOGICA NEERLANDO-SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 24 (01) : 43 - 44
  • [38] MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF CELLULAR CERAMICS
    GREEN, DJ
    CIM BULLETIN, 1987, 80 (902): : 74 - 74
  • [39] ON THE PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF SOILS
    METTAUER, H
    TUAL, Y
    HUCK, C
    TRENDEL, R
    AGRONOMIE, 1983, 3 (02): : 141 - 152
  • [40] MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF METALLIC GLASSES
    GILMAN, JJ
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1975, 46 (04) : 1625 - 1633