ORDINAL PREFERENCE AND RATIONAL CHOICE

被引：63
|
作者：
HERZBERGER, HG [1 ]
机构：
[1] UNIV TORONTO, PHILOSOPHY DEPT, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA
来源：
ECONOMETRICA | 1973年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.2307/1913486
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：187 / 237
页数：51
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    Kadzinski, Milosz
    Slowinski, Roman
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2013, 93 (2-3) : 381 - 422
  • [42] Equity, hierarchy, and ordinal social choice
    Kui Ou-Yang
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2018, 91 : 75 - 84
  • [43] Ordinal measurement, preference aggregation and interlaboratory comparisons
    Muravyov, Sergey V.
    MEASUREMENT, 2013, 46 (08) : 2927 - 2935
  • [44] Preference score of units in the presence of ordinal data
    Jahanshahloo, G. R.
    Solelmani-damaneh, M.
    Mostafaee, A.
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2009, 39 (01) : 214 - 221
  • [45] Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking
    Salvatore Corrente
    Salvatore Greco
    Miłosz Kadziński
    Roman Słowiński
    Machine Learning, 2013, 93 : 381 - 422
  • [46] Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating
    Fumagalli, Roberto
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2021, 91 (03) : 337 - 356
  • [47] Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating
    Roberto Fumagalli
    Theory and Decision, 2021, 91 : 337 - 356
  • [48] The ordinal consistency of an incomplete reciprocal preference relation
    Xu, Yejun
    Gupta, Jatinder N. D.
    Wang, Huimin
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2014, 246 : 62 - 77
  • [49] Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods
    Ali, Shehzad
    Ronaldson, Sarah
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2012, 103 (01) : 21 - 44
  • [50] Choice and religion: A critique of rational choice
    Montgomery, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 51 (04): : 752 - 754
12345