GROWTH AND BODY-COMPOSITION OF PRETERM, SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS AT A POSTMENSTRUAL AGE OF 37-40 WEEKS

被引:0
|
作者
YAU, KIT
CHANG, MH
机构
关键词
SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS; PRETERM INFANTS; BODY COMPOSITION; GROWTH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In order to understand the nutritional status of preterm, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants in the early postnatal period, the growth and body composition of preterm, SGA infants was followed prospectively from birth to the postmenstrual age of 37-40 weeks. The infants were stratified into different groups by gestational age, clinical condition and body proportionality. In each subgroup, the growth and changes in body composition of SGA infants were compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) infants of a comparable postmenstrual age. At birth, the SGA infants of both the 31-33 and 34-36 week gestational-age groups were smaller than AGA infants in all body measurements, including arm area (AA), arm muscle area (AMA) and arm fat area (AFA). When the preterm SGA infants had grown to the postmenstrual age of 37-40 weeks, the amount of fat they had accumulated was as much as, or more than that in term AGA infants. Yet, they had less muscle mass and their body weight, body length and head circumference were less than those in term AGA infants. This pattern of growth and the changes in body composition had been persistently observed in SGA infants of different gestational-age groups, different clinical status and different body proportionality. Differences between postnatal enteral nutrition and placental nutrition, or different energy utilization, in preterm SGA infants are hypothesized to account for these observations. The growth of less mature (31-33 weeks gestation) SGA infants and those preterm SGA infants with an eventful clinical course was suboptimal as compared with other SGA infants in the same subgroup. In this study, the weight to length ratio (WLR) was used to define the status of nutrition in preterm SGA infants: WLR less-than-or-equal-to 2 S.D. or > 2 S.D. off the reference mean. Infants in both groups showed some catch-up growth in body weight. Yet, at near-term their body weight were still more than 2 S.D. below the mean of term AGA. In each gestational-age group, the growth of these two body-proportionality groups did not differ from each other except for the low WLR group of 34-36 weeks gestation which had a significantly lower body weight and skinfold thickness than the group with a normal WLR. Multiple regression analysis revealed that skinfold measurements of preterm SGA infants at birth is the best factor for determining the body weight gain at near-term. After use of the skinfold thickness was set aside, WLR became the most important factor. The results of this study highlight the importance of evaluating the body composition of growing preterm SGA infants to assess their nutritional status.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 131
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INTRAUTERINE LONG-BONE GROWTH IN SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    PALACIOS, J
    RODRIGUEZ, S
    RODRIGUEZ, JI
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1992, 151 (04) : 304 - 307
  • [42] MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE AND APPROPRIATE FOR GESTATIONAL-AGE PRETERM NEWBORNS
    BANCHERTODESCA, D
    LEE, A
    DADAK, C
    WEINGER, M
    KAINZ, C
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 1995, 199 (02): : 54 - 57
  • [43] Preterm and small-for-gestational-age birth across generations
    Klebanoff, MA
    Schulsinger, C
    Mednick, BR
    Secher, NJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (03) : 521 - 526
  • [44] ZELLWEGER SYNDROME IN A PRETERM, SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT
    SAMSOM, JF
    JAKOBS, C
    VANDEKLEIVANMOORSEL, J
    SMIT, LME
    SCHUTGENS, RBH
    WANDERS, RJA
    JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE, 1992, 15 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [45] Are small-for-gestational-age preterm infants at increased risk of overweight? Statistical pitfalls in overadjusting for body size measures
    Elmrayed, Seham
    Metcalfe, Amy
    Brenner, Darren
    Wollny, Krista
    Fenton, Tanis R.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (08) : 1845 - 1851
  • [46] POSTURE IN LOW-RISK PRETERM INFANTS OF 30 WEEKS POSTMENSTRUAL AGE
    VANOOSTENBRUGGE, RJ
    VLES, JSH
    BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 17 (04): : 253 - 255
  • [47] Differences in Body Composition Between Appropriate Gestational Age and Small Gestational Age Infants at Term
    Landau, Daphne
    Stark, Sydney
    Weatherborn, Megan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 53S - 53S
  • [48] Are small-for-gestational-age preterm infants at increased risk of overweight? Statistical pitfalls in overadjusting for body size measures
    Seham Elmrayed
    Amy Metcalfe
    Darren Brenner
    Krista Wollny
    Tanis R. Fenton
    Journal of Perinatology, 2021, 41 : 1845 - 1851
  • [49] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age at 35-37 weeks of gestation: too late for management?
    Jadli, A.
    Ghosh, K.
    Shetty, S.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 47 (03) : 385 - 385
  • [50] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks
    Fadigas, C.
    Saiid, Y.
    Gonzalez, R.
    Poon, L. C.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 559 - 565