REAL-TIME TEST-RETEST AND INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF SELECT PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN PHYSICALLY ACTIVE COLLEGE-AGED STUDENTS

被引:1
|
作者
Tarara, Daniel T. [1 ]
Hegedus, Eric J. [2 ]
Taylor, Jeffrey B. [2 ]
机构
[1] High Point Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Exercise Sci, High Point, NC USA
[2] High Point Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, High Point, NC USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2014年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
Functional screen; physical performance measures; reliability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background: A new 16-item physical performance measure screening battery (16-PPM) was developed in order to expand on established movement based qualitatively scored functional screening batteries to encompass a broader spectrum of quantitatively scored functional constructs such as strength, endurance, and power. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was quantify the real-time tests-retest and expert versus novice interrater reliability of the 16-PPM screen on a group of physically active college-aged individuals. The authors' hypothesized that the test-retest and interrater reliability of quantitatively-scored performance measures would be highly correlated (ICC = 0.75) and that qualitatively-scored movement screening tests would be moderately correlated (K w = 0.41-0.60). Study Design: Cohort reliability study Methods: Nineteen (8 males, 11 females) healthy physically active college-aged students completed the 16-PPM on two days, one week apart. Results: The majority of the quantitatively scored components of the 16-PPMs demonstrated good expert-novice interrater reliability (ICC > 0.75), while qualitatively scored tests had moderate (K-w = 0.41-0.60) to substantial (K w = 0.610.80) agreement. Test-retest reliability was consistent between raters, with most quantitatively scored PPMs exhibiting superior reliability to the qualitatively scored PPMs. Conclusions: The 16-PPM test items showed good test-retest and interrater reliability. However, results indicate that expert raters may be more reliable than novice raters for qualitatively scored tests. The validity of this 16-PPM needs to be determined in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 887
页数:14
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Test-retest reliability of Patrick's hip range of motion test in healthy college-aged men
    Ross, MD
    Nordeen, MH
    Barido, M
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2003, 17 (01) : 156 - 161
  • [2] Real-time sonoelastography using an external reference material: test-retest reliability of healthy Achilles tendons
    Schneebeli, Alessandro
    Del Grande, Filippo
    Vincenzo, Gabriele
    Cescon, Corrado
    Clijsen, Ron
    Biordi, Fulvio
    Barbero, Marco
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (08) : 1045 - 1052
  • [3] Test-Retest Reliability of Eye Tracking in the Visual World Paradigm for the Study of Real-Time Spoken Word Recognition
    Farris-Trimble, Ashley
    McMurray, Bob
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 56 (04): : 1328 - 1345
  • [4] The Test-retest Reliability And Exercise-driven Changes Of UCH-L1 In Healthy, Recreationally Active College Students
    Cabell, Grant H.
    Teel, Elizabeth F.
    Hanson, Erik D.
    Mihalik, Jason P.
    Guskiewicz, Kevin M.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (05): : 834 - 834
  • [5] Assessing the robustness of muscle strength and physical performance measures in women older than 40 years: a test-retest reliability study
    Silva, Sebastiao Henrique Assis
    Orsatti, Fabio L.
    de Lima, Mariana L.
    de Freitas, Augusto C. Q.
    Carneiro, Marcelo A. S.
    Assumpcao, Claudio de Oliveira
    Souza, Markus Vinicius C.
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2024, 31 (01): : 33 - 38
  • [6] Test-retest reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a textile-based wearable sensor for real-time assessment of physical fatigue in construction bar-benders
    Anwer, Shahnawaz
    Li, Heng
    Antwi-Afari, Maxwell Fordjour
    Umer, Waleed
    Mehmood, Imran
    Al-Hussein, Mohamed
    Wong, Arnold Yu Lok
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 44