Treatment of dairy effluent model solutions by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis

被引:0
|
作者
Kyrychuk, Ivanna [1 ]
Zmievskii, Yuriy [1 ]
Myronchuk, Valeriy [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Food Technol, Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
Nanofiltration; Osmos; Effluent; Solution; Dairy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Introduction. Dairy industry generates a large amount of wastewaters that have high concentrations and contain milk components. Membrane processes have been shown to be convenient for wastewater treatment recovering milk components present in wastewaters and producing treated water. Materials and methods. The experiments were carried out in an unstirred batch sell using nanofiltration membranes OPMN-P (ZAO STC "Vladipor", Russian Federation) and reverse osmosis membranes NanoRo, ZAO ("RM Nanotech", Russian Federation). The model solutions of dairy effluents - diluted skim and whole milk were used. Results. The nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes showed the same permeate flux during the concentration of model solutions of dairy effluents. The reason of this was likely membrane fouling with feed components. The fouling indexes indicated the fouling factor that was higher for RO. The higher permeate quality was obtained with RO membranes. The NF permeate containing up to 0.4 g/L of lactose and 0.75 g/L of mineral salts can be discharged or after finishing treatment (e.g. RO or other) can be reused. The obtained NF and RO retentate corresponds to milk in composition and can be used for non-food applications or as feed supplement for animal. Conclusions. The studied RO and NF membranes can be used for concentration of dairy effluents at low pressure. They showed better performance and separation characteristics comparing with data of other membranes available in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 288
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessment of pervaporative concentration of dairy solutions vs ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis
    Zhang, Boya
    Feng, Xianshe
    [J]. SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 292
  • [12] Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment
    Myung, SW
    Choi, IH
    Lee, SH
    Kim, IC
    Lee, KH
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 51 (6-7) : 159 - 164
  • [13] Treatment of an industrial effluent by reverse osmosis
    Padilla, AP
    Tavani, EL
    [J]. DESALINATION, 1999, 126 (1-3) : 219 - 226
  • [14] Influence of filtration conditions on the performance of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in dairy wastewater treatment
    Turan, M
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2004, 170 (01) : 83 - 90
  • [15] Comparative Study on the Treatment of Biologically Treated Textile Effluent by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis for Water Reuse
    Yu, Sanchuan
    Chen, Zhiwen
    Liu, Meihong
    Zhao, Jingwei
    [J]. ECO-DYEING, FINISHING AND GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2012, 441 : 584 - +
  • [16] Comparison of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes in the treatment of biologically treated textile effluent for water reuse
    Liu, Meihong
    Lu, Zhenhua
    Chen, Zhihai
    Yu, Sanchuan
    Gao, Congjie
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2011, 281 : 372 - 378
  • [17] Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents
    Turan, M
    Ates, A
    Inanc, B
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 45 (12) : 355 - 360
  • [18] Processing of pharmaceutical effluent condensate by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane techniques
    Ravikumar, Yerrapragada Venkata Lakshmi
    Kalyani, Swayampakula
    Satyanarayana, Suggala Venkata
    Sridhar, Sundergopal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2014, 45 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [19] Modelling of ammonium fumarate recovery from model solutions by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis
    Moresi, M
    Ceccantoni, B
    Lo Presti, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2002, 209 (02) : 405 - 420
  • [20] Nanofiltration/reverse osmosis for treatment of coproduced waters
    Mondal, Subrata
    Hsiao, Ching-lun
    Wickramasinghe, S. Ranil
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2008, 27 (02): : 173 - 179