共 39 条
- [21] LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE, DEPARTMENT, et al., Third Party Plaintiffs, v. UNION PLAZA HOTEL AND CASINO, Third Party Defendant. Case No. 2: 11-cv-02007-KJD-CWH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84830 GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2013, 17 (08): : 593 - 594
- [23] BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP N. HOGEN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-519 (HHK)(AK) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46480 GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2008, 12 (04): : 349 - 352
- [24] IGT, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff, v. ALLIANCE GAMING CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation; BALLY GAMING INTERNATIONAL, TNC. a Delaware Corporation; and BALLY GAMING, INC., a Nevada Corporation d/b/a BALLY GAMING SYSTEMS, Defendants. No. 2:04-cv-01676-RCJ-RJJ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Date November 29, 2010 GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2011, 15 (05): : 289 - 295
- [25] Marcela Diaz, et al. v. Miami Air Int'l, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-413-YJC-SJH, __ F. Supp. 3d __, 2024 WL 4651871(M.D. Fla. 1 Nov. 2024) AIR & SPACE LAW, 2025, 50 (02): : 227 - 232
- [26] Shuffle Tech International, LLC et al. v. Scientific Games Corporation et al.Case No. 15 C 3702; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138741 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, October 12, 2015) GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2016, 20 (02): : 199 - 210
- [27] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. WEI SENG PHUA, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2: 14-cr-00249-APG-PAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4688 January 8, 2015, Decided January 8, 2015, Filed GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 19 (02): : 179 - 180
- [28] FSS DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. APACHE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, a federally recognized Indian tribe, et al., Defendants. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Case No. CIV-17-661-R May 16, 2018 GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2018, 22 (09): : 574 - 580
- [29] LANCASTER BINGO COMPANY LLC, Plaintiff, v. GREG HOCKMAN, et al., Defendant. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. Case No. 2:22-cv-2252. OPINION ANDORDER February 13, 2023. GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2023, 27 (05): : 264 - 270
- [30] STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, et al., Defendants. EP-99-CV-320-KC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, EL PASO DIVISION 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28026 March 6, 2015, Decided March 6, 2015, Filed GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 19 (06): : 457 - 484