United States District Court, D. Nevada. HOME GAMBLING NETWORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Chris PICHE, et al., Defendants. No. 2: 05-CV-610- DAE HOME GAMBLING NETWORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs

被引：0

作者：

Nevada, D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] HOME GAMBLING NETWORK INC, Las Vegas, NV 89193 USA

来源：

GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY | 2014年 / 18卷 / 07期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1089/glre.2014.18713

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：757 / 764

页数：8

共 39 条

[1] Federal Trade Commission, Petitioner, v. Actavis, Inc., et al., Respondents (Supreme Court of the United States)
Andrews, Cory L.
Samp, Richard A.
Mcdonald, Kevin D.
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 2013, 32 (03) : 204 - 215
[2] The Association for Molecular Pathology, et al., Petitioners, v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al., Respondents (Supreme Court of the United States) ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Ravicher, Daniel B.
Hassan, Sabrina Y.
Cardozo, Benjamin N.
Hansen, Christopher A.
Shapiro, Steven R.
Park, Sandra S.
Fine, Aden J.
Lapidus, Lenora M.
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 2012, 31 (06) : 607 - 618
[3] ALLAN STEVEN BOREN, Plaintiff, v. HARRAH'S ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.: 2:08-cv-00215-GMN-LRL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA DATED: November 30, 2010 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
不详
GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2011, 15 (05): : 297 - 300
[4] DANIELS ET. AL. v. FANDUEL, INC. AND DRAFTKINGS, INC. Case No. 18S-CQ-00134 Indiana Supreme Court (Decided October 24, 2018)
Daniels, Akeem
Stingily, Cameron
Stoner, Nicholas
GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2019, 23 (01): : 29 - 34
[5] SHERI HEAD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC; dba THE VENETIAN RESORT HOTEL CASINO/THE PALAZZO RESORT HOTEL CASINO, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division Civil Action No. 7: 17-CV-00426 March 27, 2018
Alvarez, Micaela
GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2018, 22 (07): : 417 - 428
[6] Judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States of June 27, 2005: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. et al. Vs. Grokster, Ltd. et al
不详
REVISTA LA PROPIEDAD INMATERIAL, 2009, (13): : 305 - 340
[7] WINFRIED P. RUGGIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, a division of JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No.: 1: 09-cv-1067 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47373
不详
GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2010, 14 (05): : 387 - 391
[8] Notes on Animal Science Products, Inc., et al. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. in the US Supreme Court
Zhao, Jun
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2018, 17 (04) : 993 - 1002
[9] CITIZENS FOR A BETTER WAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants No. 2: 12-cv-3021-TLN-AC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2015 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 128745 September 23, 2015, Decided September 24, 2015, Filed
Nunley, Troy L.
GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2016, 20 (01): : 118 - 132
[10] RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE RINCON RESERVATION CALIFORNIA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LARRY FLYNT et al., Defendants and Respondents. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. No. D077571 Filed October 28, 2021
Do, J.
GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2022, 26 (01): : 17 - 41

← 1 2 3 4 →