Bayview Irrigation District et al. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/1 (Award, June 19, 2007)

被引：0

作者：

Rubinina, Evgeniya ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] ICSID, Washington, DC 20433 USA

来源：

ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL | 2007年 / 22卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1093/icsidreview/22.2.433

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：433 / 437

页数：5

共 43 条

[1] Water-Related International Investment Disputes: A Fresh Look at Bayview Irrigation District v. United Mexican States
Rand, Michael
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2012, 29 (05): : 605 - 622
[2] Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25) (Award, August 16, 2007)
Antonietti, Aurelia
ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL, 2007, 22 (02) : 438 - 454
[3] SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus FULTON ET AL. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 19-123. Argued November 4, 2020-Decided June 17, 2021
不详
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57):
[4] United States District Court, D. Nevada. HOME GAMBLING NETWORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Chris PICHE, et al., Defendants. No. 2: 05-CV-610- DAE HOME GAMBLING NETWORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs
Nevada, D.
GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2014, 18 (07): : 757 - 764
[5] Provision of a Free and Appropriate Public Education in an Adult Jail during COVID-19: The Case of Charles H. et al. v. District of Columbia et al.
Gagnon, Joseph Calvin
Benedick, Amanda Ross
EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (12):
[6] “Life Technologies Corp. et al. v. Promega Corp.”Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States 22 February 2017 – Case No. 14–1538
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, 48 (5) : 588 - 588
[7] The Relativity of Free Will and Liability of the Tobacco Industry - Deconstruction of a Myth. Brazilian Meditations on the United States v. Philip Morris et al. Case
Facchini Neto, Eugenio
REVISTA DE DERECHO PRIVADO, 2016, (31) : 189 - 225
[8] STEPHEN WYNN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES CHANOS, Defendant. Case No. 14-cv-04329-WHO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174396
不详
GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 19 (03): : 216 - 222
[9] Shuffle Tech International, LLC et al. v. Scientific Games Corporation et al.Case No. 15 C 3702; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138741 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, October 12, 2015)
Kennelly, Matthew F.
GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2016, 20 (02): : 199 - 210
[10] CITIZENS FOR A BETTER WAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants No. 2: 12-cv-3021-TLN-AC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2015 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 128745 September 23, 2015, Decided September 24, 2015, Filed
Nunley, Troy L.
GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2016, 20 (01): : 118 - 132

← 1 2 3 4 5 →