A critical evaluation of preliminary design techniques for steam drive projects

被引:3
|
作者
Jensen, Trond B. [1 ]
Sharma, M. P.
Harris, H. Gordon
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Petr Engn, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0920-4105(90)90006-O
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Jensen, T.B., Sharma, M.P. and Harris, HG., 1990. A critical evaluation of preliminary design techniques for steam drive projects. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 5: 67-85. Preliminary design is critical for proper application of enhanced oil recovery processes. Initial estimates of overall project performance and economics are based on preliminary design calculations; these in turn establish the advisability of additional investment in the project. For steam drive projects, this design work requires models which accurately predict primary performance parameters, such as oil production schedules and oil/steam ratios (OSR). This paper presents an evaluation study of four simple and widely used preliminary design models for steam drives: Marx and Langenheim, Myhill and Stegemeier, Gomaa, and Jones; results from these models are history matched with sixteen field projects. Each model is evaluated with respect to instantaneous oil production rate and OSR over the life of the projects. Reservoir characteristics and operating conditions for which each model accurately predicts these parameters are established. The Marx-Langenheim and Myhill-Stegemeier methods generally overpredict instantaneous oil production rates and OSR (sometimes by orders of magnitude), and should not be used in predicting project performance or making design decisions. The models of Gomaa and Jones predict oil production rates and OSR fairly well for some classes of reservoirs, but not so well for other types, and should be used with caution.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 85
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techniques for effectively applying model checking to design projects
    Nakata, T
    Kowatari, S
    Iwashita, H
    Takayama, K
    [J]. FUJITSU SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 36 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [22] Tools and techniques for decomposing and managing complex design projects
    Rogers, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1999, 36 (01): : 266 - 274
  • [23] Techniques for effectively applying model checking to design projects
    Nakata, Tsuneo
    Kowatari, Satoshi
    Iwashita, Hiroaki
    Takayama, Koichiro
    [J]. Fujitsu Scientific and Technical Journal, 2000, 36 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [24] Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Intraoral Tongue Drive System
    Park, Hangue
    Kim, Jeonghee
    Ghovanloo, Maysam
    [J]. 2012 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2012, : 1157 - 1160
  • [25] Performance evaluation of irrigation projects: Theories, methods, and techniques
    Elshaikh, Ahmed E.
    Jiao, Xiyun
    Yan, Shi-hong
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2018, 203 : 87 - 96
  • [26] Thoughtful design critical to machine steam/condensate systems
    Byers, Dorsey W.
    [J]. Pulp and Paper, 1994, 68 (13): : 45 - 49
  • [27] THE USE OF SURVEY TECHNIQUES IN THE REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF MANUFACTURING PROJECTS
    HOLMES, N
    BRUNN, P
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 1995, 6 (02) : 192 - 200
  • [28] Critiques of the Existing Techniques for the Evaluation of Renewable Energy Projects
    Chang, Chen-Yu
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (ITMC), 2012, : 151 - 158
  • [29] Communicating engineering design -: A critical success factor in projects
    Baumgärtner, CE
    [J]. DESIGN 2002: Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference, Vols 1 and 2, 2002, : 725 - 730
  • [30] Data-mapping techniques drive network design
    [J]. Srinivasan, P., 2005, PennWell Publishing Co. (22):