Comparison of Wound Infection rate in Open Appendectomy (OA) vs Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA)

被引:0
|
作者
Javed, Nida [1 ]
Iqbal, Ejaz [1 ]
Iqbal, Rauf [2 ]
Cheema, Khalid Mehmood [3 ]
机构
[1] Sahara Med Coll, Surg, Narowal, Pakistan
[2] Nishtar Hosp, Multan, Pakistan
[3] King Edward Med Univ, Surg, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES | 2018年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
Acute Appendicitis; Appendectomy; Open vs Laparoscopic; Wound infection; Surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There are two methods for removal of appendix: Conventional Open Appendectomy and Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Open appendectomy technique is associated with shorter operating time, more post operative pain, and more wound related complications. On the other hand, Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with reduced infection rates, lesser post operative pain, early return to work, better cosmesis, but at the expense of longer duration of operation. None of the local studies so far have succeeded in proving statistically significant difference in frequency of wound infection between the two groups. This study has been designed with a large sample size to give a clear picture regarding wound infection in both treatment modalities. Aim: To compare frequency of wound infection following open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: Study was conducted at North Surgical Unit, Mayo Hospital, Lahore. This was a prospective randomized controlled trail. Total 300 patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups i.e., those undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA group) and those undergoing open appendectomy (OA group) on arrival in operating suite by pulling an envelope method. There was no ethical issue associated with this study (certificate attached). Each group was prepared for surgery in the same manner. For data entry and analysis SPSS version 10 was used. Results: Mean age of patients in Group-OA and in Group-LA was 23.40 +/- 9.93 and 25.20 +/- 6.52 years respectively. Overall female patients were greater as compared to male patients. None of the patients in both treatment groups had infection at 30th day. Whereas at 7th day 11.3% patients had infection in OA and in LA group only 2.7% patients had infection. Infection rate was less in LA group as compared to OA group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with a statistically significant lower rate of wound infection as compared to open appendectomy. Although laparoscopic appendectomy is relatively expensive, but it is a safe and effective procedure for the removal of appendix over open appendectomy
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1239
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LAPAROSCOPIC VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY FOR SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS
    MACARULLA, E
    HASSAN, H
    ABAD, JM
    VALLET, J
    CLAVERIA, R
    BESORA, P
    BASAS, J
    FELIU, X
    CAMPS, J
    VINAS, X
    FERNANDEZ, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 : 6 - 7
  • [22] Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in overweight patients
    L. Enochsson
    A. Hellberg
    C. Rudberg
    G. Fenyö
    T. Gudbjartson
    E. Kullman
    I. Ringqvist
    S. Sörensen
    J. Wenner
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2001, 15 : 387 - 392
  • [23] Laparoscopic vs Open Appendectomy in Older Patients
    Southgate, Eleanor
    Vousden, Nicola
    Karthikesalingam, Alan
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Black, Stephen
    Zaidi, Ahsan
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (06) : 557 - 562
  • [24] EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS. OPEN APPENDECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY AT LA PAZ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, MADRID, SPAIN
    Salinas Gomez, J.
    Gonzalez Gomez, C.
    Rodriguez-Montes, J. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 18 - 18
  • [25] Comparison of surgical-site infection between open and laparoscopic appendectomy
    Suh, Yong Joon
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    Park, Jae-Gahb
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Kim, Duck-Woo
    Oh, Heung-Kwon
    Shin, Rumi
    Kim, Ji Sun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 82 (01): : 35 - 39
  • [26] Comparison of clinical outcomes and hospital cost between open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy
    Lee, Ho Jun
    Park, Yong Hwan
    Kim, Jae Il
    Choi, Pyong Wha
    Park, Je Hoon
    Heo, Tae Gil
    Lee, Myung Soo
    Kim, Chul Nam
    Chang, Surk Hyo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 81 (05): : 321 - 325
  • [27] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs multiport laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparison
    Chandler, Nicole M.
    Danielson, Paul D.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2010, 45 (11) : 2186 - 2190
  • [28] Competitive Edge of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy: A Subgroup Comparison Analysis
    Wu, Hurng-Sheng
    Lai, Hung-Wen
    Kuo, Shou-Jen
    Lee, Yueh-Tsung
    Chen, Dar-Ren
    Chi, Chin-Wen
    Huang, Min-Ho
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 21 (03): : 197 - 202
  • [29] Appendectomy—laparoscopic or open?
    A. Cuschieri
    Surgical Endoscop, 1997, 11 : 319 - 320
  • [30] A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses
    Long, KH
    Bannon, MP
    Zietlow, SP
    Helgeson, ER
    Harmsen, WS
    Smith, CD
    Ilstrup, DM
    Baerga-Verala, Y
    Sarr, MG
    SURGERY, 2001, 129 (04) : 390 - 400