Comparison of Wound Infection rate in Open Appendectomy (OA) vs Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA)

被引:0
|
作者
Javed, Nida [1 ]
Iqbal, Ejaz [1 ]
Iqbal, Rauf [2 ]
Cheema, Khalid Mehmood [3 ]
机构
[1] Sahara Med Coll, Surg, Narowal, Pakistan
[2] Nishtar Hosp, Multan, Pakistan
[3] King Edward Med Univ, Surg, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
关键词
Acute Appendicitis; Appendectomy; Open vs Laparoscopic; Wound infection; Surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There are two methods for removal of appendix: Conventional Open Appendectomy and Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Open appendectomy technique is associated with shorter operating time, more post operative pain, and more wound related complications. On the other hand, Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with reduced infection rates, lesser post operative pain, early return to work, better cosmesis, but at the expense of longer duration of operation. None of the local studies so far have succeeded in proving statistically significant difference in frequency of wound infection between the two groups. This study has been designed with a large sample size to give a clear picture regarding wound infection in both treatment modalities. Aim: To compare frequency of wound infection following open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: Study was conducted at North Surgical Unit, Mayo Hospital, Lahore. This was a prospective randomized controlled trail. Total 300 patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups i.e., those undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA group) and those undergoing open appendectomy (OA group) on arrival in operating suite by pulling an envelope method. There was no ethical issue associated with this study (certificate attached). Each group was prepared for surgery in the same manner. For data entry and analysis SPSS version 10 was used. Results: Mean age of patients in Group-OA and in Group-LA was 23.40 +/- 9.93 and 25.20 +/- 6.52 years respectively. Overall female patients were greater as compared to male patients. None of the patients in both treatment groups had infection at 30th day. Whereas at 7th day 11.3% patients had infection in OA and in LA group only 2.7% patients had infection. Infection rate was less in LA group as compared to OA group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with a statistically significant lower rate of wound infection as compared to open appendectomy. Although laparoscopic appendectomy is relatively expensive, but it is a safe and effective procedure for the removal of appendix over open appendectomy
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1239
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of postoperative wound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy
    Jan, Yousaf
    Din, Waqas Ahmad
    Khan, Muhammad Imran
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (01): : 55 - 57
  • [2] Laparoscopic appendectomy - A comparison with open appendectomy
    Kluiber, RM
    Hartsman, B
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (09) : 1008 - 1011
  • [3] Comparison of laparoscopic and open appendectomy on wound infection and healing in complicated appendicitis
    Guler, Yilmaz
    Karabulut, Zulfikar
    Calis, Hasan
    Sengul, Serkan
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (04) : 957 - 965
  • [4] Open Appendectomy vs Laparoscopic Appendectomy an Institutional Experience
    Pramanik, Prasun
    Dnyanmote, Anuradha Santosh
    Chavan, Shahaji Govind
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 6 (03): : 1816 - 1827
  • [5] Open vs laparoscopic appendectomy
    Lippert, H
    Koch, A
    Marusch, F
    Wolff, S
    Gastinger, I
    CHIRURG, 2002, 73 (08): : 791 - 798
  • [6] ANALYSIS OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY COMPARISON WITH OPEN APPENDECTOMY WITH RESPECT TO SURGICAL SITE INFECTION
    Ahmed, Waqas
    Ali, Sheikh Muhammad Umair
    Fatima, Sundas
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (11): : 12079 - 12082
  • [7] Laparoscopic appendectomy: Comparison with open appendectomy in 720 patients
    Richards, KF
    Fisher, KS
    Flores, JH
    Christensen, BJ
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 6 (03) : 205 - 209
  • [8] Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy
    Yagmurlu, A.
    Vernon, A.
    Barnhart, D. C.
    Georgeson, K. E.
    Harmon, C. M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (07): : 1051 - 1054
  • [9] Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy
    A. Yagmurlu
    A. Vernon
    D. C. Barnhart
    K. E. Georgeson
    C. M. Harmon
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2006, 20 : 1051 - 1054
  • [10] Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Comparison with Open Appendectomy
    Katsuno, Goutaro
    Nagakari, Kunihiko
    Yoshikawa, Seiichiro
    Sugiyama, Kazuyoshi
    Fukunaga, Masaki
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (02) : 208 - 214