PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ELICITOR-INDUCED LIPOXYGENASE IN TOBACCO CELLS

被引:60
|
作者
FOURNIER, J
POUENAT, ML
RICKAUER, M
RABINOVITCHCHABLE, H
RIGAUD, M
ESQUERRETUGAYE, MT
机构
[1] UNIV TOULOUSE 3,CTR PHYSIOL VEGETALE,CNRS,UA 1457,118 ROUTE NARBONNE,F-31062 TOULOUSE,FRANCE
[2] FAC MED LIMOGES,BIOCHIM LAB,F-87025 LIMOGES,FRANCE
来源
PLANT JOURNAL | 1993年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00011.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Lipoxygenase activity was induced in a tobacco cell suspension culture by treatment with glycopeptide elicitors prepared from the cell walls of Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae, and in tobacco seedlings infected by this fungal pathogen. Upon purification and characterization, the enzyme appeared to have a molecular weight of 96 000, a pI of 5.1 and a K(m) of 20.9 muM with linoleic acid as substrate. According to its acidic optimum pH, it belongs to type-2 lipoxygenases. Using linoleic, linolenic and arachidonic acids as substrates, the products formed in vitro by lipoxygenase were characterized. 9- and 5-hydroperoxides were the main products obtained from the C18 and C20 fatty acids, respectively, thereby indicating that a 5-lipoxygenase accounts for most of the elicitor-induced activity, since the main site of insertion of molecular oxygen is on C-5 of arachidonic acid. Small amounts of 13-hydroperoxides were also formed from the C18 fatty acids. In vitro, the strongest inhibitors of tobacco lipoxygenase were n-propylgallate and nordihydroguaiaretic acid. The possible involvement of this enzyme in signaling phenomena leading to defense induction in plants via jasmonic acid and other fatty acid-derived products is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PROTEIN-PHOSPHORYLATION IS INDUCED IN TOBACCO CELLS BY THE ELICITOR CRYPTOGEIN
    VIARD, MP
    MARTIN, F
    PUGIN, A
    RICCI, P
    BLEIN, JP
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 104 (04) : 1245 - 1249
  • [42] Involvement of nitric oxide in elicitor-induced defense responses and secondary metabolism of Taxus chinensis cells
    Wang, JW
    Wu, JY
    NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 11 (04): : 298 - 306
  • [43] Molecular mechanisms for pathogenic elicitor-induced cell cycle arrest at G2 checkpoint in synchronized tobacco BY-2 cells.
    Ohno, R
    Kadota, Y
    Fujii, S
    Sekine, M
    Umeda, M
    Kuchitsu, K
    PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 47 : S187 - S187
  • [44] Tobacco cells contain a protein, immunologically related to the neutrophil small G protein Rac2 and involved in elicitor-induced oxidative burst
    Kieffer, F
    SimonPlas, F
    Maume, BF
    Blein, JP
    FEBS LETTERS, 1997, 403 (02) : 149 - 153
  • [45] Pathogen elicitor-induced changes in the maize extracellular matrix proteome
    Chivasa, S
    Simon, WJ
    Yu, XL
    Yalpani, N
    Slabas, AR
    PROTEOMICS, 2005, 5 (18) : 4894 - 4904
  • [46] CYTOSOLIC PROTONS AS SECONDARY MESSENGERS IN ELICITOR-INDUCED DEFENSE RESPONSES
    MATHIEU, Y
    JOUANNEAU, JP
    THOMINE, S
    LAPOUS, D
    GUERN, J
    MOLECULAR BOTANY: SIGNALS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1994, (60): : 113 - 130
  • [47] BIOSYNTHESIS OF ELICITOR-INDUCED PHYTOALEXIN, GLYCEOLLIN IN SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX)
    ZAHRINGER, U
    EBEL, J
    KREUZALER, F
    GRISEBACH, H
    HOPPE-SEYLERS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIOLOGISCHE CHEMIE, 1977, 358 (10): : 1303 - 1304
  • [48] ELICITOR-INDUCED PRODUCTION OF SECONDARY METABOLITES IN HIGHER-PLANTS
    NISHI, A
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 1993, 113 (12): : 847 - 860
  • [49] ARE POLYPHOSPHOINOSITIDES INVOLVED IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION OF ELICITOR-INDUCED PHYTOALEXIN SYNTHESIS IN CULTURED PLANT-CELLS
    STRASSER, H
    HOFFMANN, C
    GRISEBACH, H
    MATERN, U
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATURFORSCHUNG C-A JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 1986, 41 (7-8): : 717 - 724
  • [50] Involvement of jasmonic acid in elicitor-induced phytoalexin production in suspension-cultured rice cells
    Nojiri, H
    Sugimori, M
    Yamane, H
    Nishimura, Y
    Yamada, A
    Shibuya, N
    Kodama, O
    Murofushi, N
    Omori, T
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 110 (02) : 387 - 392