BIODYNAMIC RESPONSE OF THE HAND-ARM SYSTEM TO VIBRATION FROM AN IMPACT HAMMER AND A GRINDER

被引:69
|
作者
KIHLBERG, S
机构
[1] Division of Work and Environmental Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health
关键词
FREQUENCY WEIGHTING; DISSIPATED POWER; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; IMPACT; IMPEDANCE; HAND-ARM VIBRATION; HARMONIC VIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/0169-8141(94)00060-G
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The dynamic response of the hand/arm system due to exposure of two types of vibrations, one from an impact hammer and one from a grinder, were studied. The aim of the investigation was to study whether the dynamic response was dependent of the type of exposure and/or the frequency of the vibration. The dynamic responses studied were driving point impedance, transfer function from handle to finger, wrist and elbow. The energy per time (dissipated power) absorbed in the hand-arm system as well as the influences of grip and push forces on the impedance were also studied. When grip and push forces were kept constant, no differences were found, in either transfer function or driving-point impedance, between impact and harmonic exposure. Increasing grip as well as push forces increased the impedance, both in resonance frequency and in magnitude. This means that the dissipated power depends on both (1) frequency contents of the vibration and (2) forces (grip and push). Exposures with predominantly lower frequencies (< 50 Hz) caused a greater load on the elbow and shoulder joints than exposures with higher frequencies (greater than or equal to 100 Hz). Up to about 250 Hz, the finger acts like a rigid body. When people exert force they tighten their muscles and this means that their hand-arm acts like a ''stiffer spring'' and thus increases the resonance frequency. The hand-arm system is also a non-linear system. Relevance to industry The paper discusses the dynamic response of the hand-arm system to exposure of vibration from an impact tool (impact hammer) and a non-impact tool (grinder). Factors like frequency content of the vibration, and grip and push forces influence the energy absorbed in the hand-arm system. Whenever possible, a tool that requires low grip and push forces should be used. This can be helpful in choosing the proper tool for the job.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Spectral Response of Hand-Arm System
    Baranski, R.
    Batko, W.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2011, 119 (6A) : 913 - 915
  • [22] Hand-Arm Vibration Risk
    Brammer, Anthony J.
    Pitts, Paul M.
    INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2012, 50 (05) : 341 - 341
  • [23] Hand-arm vibration syndrome
    Pelmear, PL
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2004, 54 (02): : 128 - 130
  • [24] Hand-arm vibration syndrome
    Weir, E
    Lander, L
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 172 (08) : 1001 - 1002
  • [25] MEASUREMENT OF HAND-ARM VIBRATION
    KITCHENER, R
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1975, 43 (04) : 725 - 725
  • [26] Hand-arm vibration in cycling
    Chiementin, X.
    Rigaut, M.
    Crequy, S.
    Bolaers, F.
    Bertucci, W.
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2013, 19 (16) : 2551 - 2560
  • [27] Monitoring Of Hand-Arm Vibration
    Ab Aziz, Shamsul Akmar
    Nuawi, Mohd Zaki
    Nor, Mohd Jailani Mohd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACOUSTICS AND VIBRATION, 2017, 22 (01): : 34 - 43
  • [28] Correlations between biodynamic characteristics of human hand-arm system and the isolation effectiveness of anti-vibration gloves
    Dong, RG
    McDowell, TW
    Welcome, DE
    Smutz, WP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2005, 35 (03) : 205 - 216
  • [29] HAND-ARM VIBRATION SYNDROME
    PELMEAR, PL
    TAYLOR, W
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1994, 38 (02): : 180 - 185
  • [30] Modeling of biodynamic responses distributed at the fingers and the palm of the human hand-arm system
    Dong, Ren G.
    Dong, Jennie H.
    Wu, John Z.
    Rakheja, Subhash
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (10) : 2335 - 2340