TOXICITY OF ENDOSULFAN TO NATIVE AND INTRODUCED FISH IN AUSTRALIA

被引:65
|
作者
SUNDERAM, RIM
CHENG, DMH
THOMPSON, GB
机构
[1] UNIV TECHNOL SYDNEY, BANKSTOWN, NSW 2200, AUSTRALIA
[2] UNIV TECHNOL SYDNEY, GORE HILL, NSW 2065, AUSTRALIA
关键词
TOXICITY; BIOASSAY; ENDOSULFAN; AUSTRALIAN FISH;
D O I
10.1002/etc.5620111012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Semistatic bioassays of endosulfan with native and introduced Australian fish indicated that they are sensitive to this insecticide at low concentrations. The introduced European carp (Cyprinus carpio) was the most sensitive species, with a measured 96-h LC50 of 0.1 mug/L, whereas the native eastern rainbow fish (Melanotaenia duboulayi) and silver perch (Bidyanus bidyanus) were the least sensitive, with measured 96-h LC50 values of 2.4 mug/L. The measured 96-h LC50 values of endosulfan for bony bream (Nematolosa erebi), golden perch (Macquaria ambigua), and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were 0.2, 0.5, and 1.6 mug/L, respectively. Toxicities of endosulfan in Sydney mains water and Mehi River water were similar when rainbow fish, golden perch, and silver perch were used as test animals. The initial measured concentration was about 42% of the nominal concentration, whereas final measured concentration after 24 h in semistatic tests declined to 5.6% of the nominal concentration. The toxicity of endosulfan was similar in Australian native and introduced fish and in overseas fish, but varied markedly with test method. The 96-h LC50 values for one species, the rainbow fish, varied from 0.5 mug/L when reported as measured concentrations in a flow-through test to 11.4 mug/L as nominal values in a static test. These differences span much of the variation found in 96-h LC50 values for all fish species described in the world literature.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1476
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NATIVE AND INTRODUCED BIRDS OF GALAPAGOS AS DISPERSERS OF NATIVE AND INTRODUCED PLANTS
    Mireya Guerrero, Ana
    Tye, Alan
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL, 2011, 22 (02): : 207 - 217
  • [32] Australia Says No Endosulfan Ban
    不详
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 117 (02) : A60 - A60
  • [33] THE ABUNDANCE OF NATIVE INSECTS ON THE INTRODUCED WEED MIMOSA-PIGRA IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA
    FLANAGAN, GJ
    WILSON, CG
    GILLETT, JD
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 1990, 6 : 219 - 230
  • [34] Haemoprotozoan surveillance in peri-urban native and introduced wildlife from Australia
    Egan, Siobhon L.
    Taylor, Casey L.
    Austen, Jill M.
    Banks, Peter B.
    Northover, Amy S.
    Ahlstrom, Liisa A.
    Ryan, Una M.
    Irwin, Peter J.
    Oskam, Charlotte L.
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN PARASITOLOGY & VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES, 2021, 1
  • [35] Variation in the use of corridors by introduced and native rodents in south-eastern Australia
    Downes, SJ
    Handasyde, KA
    Elgar, MA
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 82 (03) : 379 - 383
  • [36] Drought resistance of native and introduced perennial grasses of south-eastern Australia
    Bolger, TP
    Rivelli, AR
    Garden, DL
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2005, 56 (11): : 1261 - 1267
  • [37] Biomonitoring of endosulfan toxicity in human
    Karn, Santosh Kumar
    Upadhyay, Aditya
    Kumar, Awanish
    BIOCELL, 2022, 46 (07) : 1771 - 1777
  • [38] Potential distribution in Colombia of the introduced fish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Siluriformes: Pangasiidae) and implications for endangered native fish
    Castellanos-Mejia, Maria C.
    Herrera, Juliana
    Noguera-Urbano, Elkin A.
    Parra, Edison
    Jimenez-Segura, Luz F.
    REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA TROPICAL, 2021, 69 (02) : 573 - 587
  • [39] ENDOSULFAN TOXICITY AND DIETARY PROTEIN
    BOYD, EM
    DOBOS, I
    KRIJNEN, CJ
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1970, 21 (01): : 15 - &
  • [40] The relative impacts of native and introduced predatory fish on a temporary wetland tadpole assemblage
    Baber, MJ
    Babbitt, KJ
    OECOLOGIA, 2003, 136 (02) : 289 - 295