Breast Cancer: Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Parametric Response Maps for MR Imaging

被引:1
|
作者
Su, M. -Y. L.
机构
来源
BREAST DISEASES | 2015年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.breastdis.2015.04.005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose. -To prospectively compare the performance of dynamic contrast materialeenhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using parametric response map (PRM) analysis with that using pharmacokinetic parameters (transfer constant [Ktrans], rate constant [kep], and relative extravascular extracellular space [ve]) in the early prediction of pathologic responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods. -The institutional review board approved this 134 Breast Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly Vol 26 No 2 2015study; informed consent was obtained. Between August 2010 and December 2012, 48 women (mean age, 46.4 years; range, 29e65 years) with breast cancer were enrolled and treated with an anthracycline-taxane regimen. DCEMRimaging was performed before and after the first cycle of chemotherapy, and the pathologic response was assessed after surgery. Tumor size and volume, PRM characteristics, and pharmacokinetic arameters (Ktrans, kep, and ve) on MR images were assessed and compared according to the pathologic responses by using the Fisher exact test or the independent-sample t test. Results. -Six of 48 (12%) patients howed pathologic complete response (CR) (pCR) and 42 (88%) showed nonpathologic CR (npCR). Thirty-eight (79%) patients showed a good response (Miller-Payne score of 3, 4, or 5), and 10 (21%) showed a minor response (Miller-Payne score of 1 or 2). The mean proportion of voxels with increased signal intensity (PRMSI+) in the pCR or good response group was significantly lower than that in the npCR or minor response group (14.0% ± 6.5 vs 40.7% ± 27.2, P <001; 34.3% ± 26.4 vs 52.8% ± 24.9, P 1/4041). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for PRMSI+ in the pCR group was 0.770 (95% confidence interval: 0.626, 0.879), and that for the good response group was 0.716 (95% confidence interval: 0.567, 0.837). No difference in tumor size, tumor volume, or pharmacokinetic parameters was found between groups. Conclusion. -PRM analysis of DCE MR images may enab the early identification of the pathologic response to NAC after the first cycle of chemotherapy, whereas pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, kep, and ve) do not.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 137
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response using diffuse optical spectroscopy in breast cancer
    Ying-hua Yu
    Xiao Zhu
    Qin-guo Mo
    Ying Cui
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2018, 20 : 524 - 533
  • [32] Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response using diffuse optical spectroscopy in breast cancer
    Yu, Ying-hua
    Zhu, Xiao
    Mo, Qin-guo
    Cui, Ying
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 (04): : 524 - 533
  • [33] Predicting Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer by Using MR Imaging and Quantitative 1H MR Spectroscopy
    Baek, Hyeon-Man
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Nie, Ke
    Yu, Hon J.
    Bahri, Shadfar
    Mehta, Rita S.
    Nalcioglu, Orhan
    Su, Min-Ying
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (03) : 653 - 662
  • [34] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Early Prediction of Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Lee, Youn Joo
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Kim, Yun Ju
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2019, 40 (02): : 193 - 204
  • [35] Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for early prediction of response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Guo, Jiabao
    Wang, Bao-Hua
    He, Mengna
    Fu, Peifen
    Yao, Minya
    Jiang, Tian'an
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [36] Molecular prediction of the therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Nagasaki, Koichi
    Miki, Yoshio
    BREAST CANCER, 2008, 15 (02) : 117 - 120
  • [37] Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Radiomic Study
    Wu, Guolin
    Fan, Ming
    Zhang, Juan
    Zheng, Bin
    Li, Lihua
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGING INFORMATICS FOR HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH, AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 10138
  • [38] Molecular prediction of the therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Koichi Nagasaki
    Yoshio Miki
    Breast Cancer, 2008, 15 : 117 - 120
  • [39] Multimodality Imaging for Evaluating Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Adrada, Beatriz Elena
    Kuerer, Henry Mark
    van la Parra, Raquel F. D.
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    Yang, Wei Tse
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (02) : 290 - 299
  • [40] Machine learning with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Lo Gullo, Roberto
    Eskreis-Winkler, Sarah
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Pinker, Katja
    BREAST, 2020, 49 : 115 - 122