SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AND INTERNAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN ROMANIA

被引:1
|
作者
Yaskal, Ihor [1 ]
Maha, Liviu-George [2 ]
Petrashchak, Oksana [1 ]
机构
[1] Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi Natl Univ, 2 Kotsjubynskyi Str, UA-58012 Chernovtsy, Ukraine
[2] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Iasi, Romania
关键词
production factor distribution; Kullback-Leibler divergence; internal economic integration; spatial distribution of economic activities; specialization; location quotient;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper aims to consider two tendencies in economy simultaneously: internal integration within the country and localization of economic activities. Firstly, we examine the quantitative measurement of internal economic integration in Romania. Different methods of economic integration measuring have been developed over time, so we have defined and discussed three approaches. To estimate a level of internal integration the link between the region's share in the total output and production factors was estimated and the pattern of distribution of these shares among the regions of Romania was assessed. The calculations have underlined an increasing tendency to deepen the internal economic integration of the Romanian economy. Secondly, the analysis of spatial distribution of economic activity has demonstrated that the capital region Bucharest-Ilfov concentrates the biggest share of employment and production. This indicates that initially there were higher economic activities and a labor deficit has been created, which was later covered by moving employees from other regions. As a result, the capital region concentrates 14.35% of the civil economically active population and 26.78% of the regional gross domestic product in 2014. By computing the location coefficient, we have observed that the counties with the biggest shares in the total GDP are characterized by a higher level of specialization simultaneously in many sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 240
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants
    Taylor, BW
    Irwin, RE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (51) : 17725 - 17730
  • [32] On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration, Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad
    van Oort, Frank
    Burger, Martijn
    Raspe, Otto
    URBAN STUDIES, 2010, 47 (04) : 725 - 748
  • [33] Evolution of spatial distribution of economic activity in Russia
    Kolomak E.A.
    Regional Research of Russia, 2015, 5 (3) : 236 - 242
  • [34] Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity - Location Quotient
    Kovac, Stefan
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN CONFERENCE IN FINANCE AND ECONOMICS (CEFE2015), 2015, : 316 - 322
  • [35] SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF INFLATION - PUZZLE FOR ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHERS
    LEAHY, EP
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1971, 23 (02): : 137 - 143
  • [36] Growth of the Urban Shadow, Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities, and Commuting by Workers in Rural and Urban India
    Sharma, Ajay
    Chandrasekhar, S.
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 61 : 154 - 166
  • [37] ECONOMIC INTEGRATION, INCOME-DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMPTION - NEW RATIONAL FOR INTEGRATION
    MANTEL, RR
    MARTIRENAMANTEL, AM
    TRIMESTRE ECONOMICO, 1975, 42 (167): : 631 - 669
  • [38] Internal versus external heat integration - Operational and economic analysis
    Schmal, J. P.
    Van der Kooi, H. J.
    De Rijke, A.
    Olujic, Z.
    Jansens, P. J.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2006, 84 (A5): : 374 - 380
  • [39] Bilevel economic operation of distribution networks with microgrid integration
    Zhang, Hong
    Zhao, Dongmei
    Gu, Chenghong
    Li, Furong
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2015, 7 (02)
  • [40] Legal Conditions for Integration of Regional Companies in Foreign Economic Activities
    Dashin, Alexey
    Petrov, Igor
    Simatova, Elena
    Shapoval, Olga
    OVERCOMING UNCERTAINTY OF INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT AS A TOOL OF GLOBAL CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2017, : 113 - 127