ESTIMATES FOR BROAD SENSE HERITABILITY AND HETEROSIS OF AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY CHARACTERS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.)

被引:0
|
作者
Baydar, Hasan [1 ]
Erbas, Sabri [1 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, Isparta, Turkey
来源
关键词
safflower; yield and quality characters; broad sense heritability; heterosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The present research was conducted in between 2008 and 2011 at Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Isparta Turkey (latitude 37(o)45' N, longitude 30(o)33' E, altitude 997 m). In study was estimated to genotypic (sigma(2)(g)) and phenotypic (sigma(2)(p)) variances, broad sense heritability (h(b)(2)) and heterosis value of agronomic and quality characters of F-1 and F-2 plants derived from a cross between Dincer 5-118 and Montola 2000 cultivars. In F-1 generation, heterosis and heterobeltiosis were high and positive for plant height, head number per plant, 1000 seed weight, seed yield per plant, palmitic acid and linoleic acid. In addition, heterosis and heterobeltiosis were low and positive for branches number, harvest index and oil content. On the other hand, heterobeltiosis was negative for seed number per head and oleic acid. The highest broad sense heritability was estimated seed number per head, 1000 seed weight, oleic acid and linoleic acid (80.1, 81.1, 99.4 and 99.3%, respectively). The broad sense heritability were estimated as 64.1% for plant height, 54.3% for primary branches, 74.7% for head number per plant, 72.1% for harvest index, 55.2% for seed yield per plant, 67.6% for oil content, 47.3% for palmitic acid and 48.2% for stearic acid. The results of this study indicated that plant height, head number per plant, 1000 seed weight, seed number per head, harvest index, oil content, oleic acid and linoleic acid firstly be evaluated for increase to succeed in practical selection in early generation.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MORPHOLOGICAL AND ANATOMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) HYPSOPHYLS AND LEAVES
    Dobrin, Aurora
    Popa, Vlad Ioan
    Potor, Constantin Daniel
    Georgescu, Mihaela Ioana
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2021, 64 (01): : 681 - 686
  • [32] STUDY ON EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SULPHUR DOSES ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) CULTIVARS
    Tuncturk, R.
    Tuncturk, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04): : 1425 - 1431
  • [33] INHERITANCE OF OIL YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.)
    Kose, Arzu
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FIELD CROPS, 2019, 24 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [34] EMS-induced cytomictic variability in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)
    P. Srivastava
    G. Kumar
    Cytology and Genetics, 2011, 45 : 240 - 244
  • [35] MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS BASED GENETIC DIVERSITY IN SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)
    Shinwari, Zabta Khan
    Rehman, Hina
    Rabbani, M. Ashiq
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2014, 46 (04) : 1389 - 1395
  • [36] RESEARCH ON SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) CROP IN THE CONDITIONS OF SOUTHEASTERN ROMANIA
    Dobrin, Aurora
    Marin, Doru Ioan
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2015, 58 : 181 - 184
  • [37] Studies on Population Dynamics of Insect Pest of Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L.
    Javed, Humayun
    Iqbal, Javaid
    Khan, Tahir Mahmood
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2013, 45 (01) : 213 - 217
  • [38] Toxic effects of Carthamus tinctorius L. (Safflower) extract on mouse spermatogenesis
    Mehri Mirhoseini
    Masoomeh Mohamadpour
    Layasadat Khorsandi
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2012, 29 : 457 - 461
  • [39] The Effect of Vermicompost Levels on the Four Safflower cultivars (carthamus tinctorius L.)
    Dehghaninezhad, Hamid Reza
    Bagheripour, Mohammad Ali
    Mehraban, Ahmad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED BIOTECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH, 2016, 7 : 488 - 496
  • [40] Radiation-Induced Reciprocal Translocations in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)
    Verma, Rakesh Chandra
    Shrivastava, Pratibha
    CYTOLOGIA, 2014, 79 (04) : 541 - 545