ANTITRUST TREATMENT OF COMPETITIVE TORTS - AN ARGUMENT FOR A RULE OF PER SE LEGALITY UNDER THE SHERMAN ACT

被引：0

|

作者：

MCBREARTY, ME

机构：

来源：

TEXAS LAW REVIEW | 1980年 / 58卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：415 / 434

页数：20

相关论文

共 40 条

[31] Reproduction is not a major life activity: Implications for HIV infection as a per se disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnston, TD
[J]. CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 1999, 85 (01) : 189 - 270
[32] Barring foul blows: An argument for a per se reversible-error rule for prosecutors' use of religious arguments in the sentencing phase of capital cases
Duffy, BC
[J]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 1997, 50 (05) : 1335 - 1385
[33] Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) Agreements Under AML 2008 - Per Se Illegal Treatment vis-a-vis the Rule-of-Reason Approach
Bu, Qingxiu
[J]. IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2015, 46 (05) : 565 - 587
[34] The treatment of metering in antitrust law:: The supreme court's apparent abolition of the per se rule against metering in Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.
Grill, Brian T.
[J]. WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW, 2006, (05) : 1465 - 1492
[35] GTE SYLVANIA, INC V CONTINENTAL TV, INC - LOCATION CLAUSES, PER SE RULES, AND SHERMAN-ACT - FREEDOM TO RAMBLE THROUGH WILDS OF ECONOMIC-THEORY
VIDELOCK, EN
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, 1976, 38 (02) : 373 - 394
[36] UNJUSTIFIED PER SE CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LIABILITY UNDER THE TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974 (CTH) FOR SUPPLY AGREEMENTS BETWEEN COMPETITORS
Fisse, Brent
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES LAW JOURNAL, 2009, 32 (01): : 239 - 248
[37] CONSCIOUS PARALLELISM IN THE USE OF DELIVERED PRICING SYSTEMS - A MODIFIED PER SE STANDARD OF REVIEW UNDER THE FEDERAL-TRADE-COMMISSION ACT
ANDERSON, AM
[J]. CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 1981, 66 (06) : 1194 - 1217
[38] Per Sex-Act Risk of HIV Transmission Under Antiretroviral Treatment: A Data-Driven Approach
Supervie, Virginie
Breban, Romulus
[J]. JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2018, 79 (04) : 440 - 444
[39] UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER SHERMAN-ACT - C-ALBERT-SAUTER-CO V RICHARD-S-SAUTER-CO AND PICK-BARTH RULE
不详
[J]. IOWA LAW REVIEW, 1974, 59 (05) : 1194 - 1225
[40] SHERMAN-ACT AND PROFESSIONAL TEAM SPORTS - NFL ROZELLE RULE INVALID UNDER RULE OF REASON - MACKEY V NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, 543 F 2D 606 (8TH CIR 1976)
BRYCE, PR
[J]. CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW, 1977, 9 (02) : 336 - 345

← 1 2 3 4 →