RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL AND INTRACERVICAL PROSTAGLANDIN E(2) GEL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR AT TERM

被引:2
|
作者
VARAKLIS, K
GUMINA, R
STUBBLEFIELD, PG
机构
[1] MAINE MED CTR,PORTLAND,ME 04102
[2] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,CHICAGO,IL 60611
[3] BOSTON UNIV,BOSTON,MA 02215
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 1995年 / 86卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(95)80012-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare misoprostol 25 mu g administered at a-hour intervals with intracervical prostaglandin (PG) E(2) in women with Bishop scores of 5 or less. Methods: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either misoprostol 25 mu g every 2 hours or a commercially available intracervical preparation containing 0.5 mg of PGE(2) gel administered at 6-hour intervals for a maximum of two doses. Results: Women who received misoprostol experienced a significantly reduced mean time (+/- standard deviation) from drug administration to onset of three contractions in 10 minutes, 6.7 +/- 5.8 versus 12.4 +/- 9.6 hours (P = .007). Mean time to rupture of membranes was also shorter in the misoprostol group, 9.7 +/- 5.5 versus 13.6 +/- 6.8 hours (P = .01), as was the mean time to delivery, 16.0 +/- 7.7 versus 22.4 +/- 10.9 hours (P = .006). Three patients in the misoprostol group experienced uterine hypertonus but no related fetal morbidity. Conclusion: Misoprostol is more effective than intracervical PGE(2) in bringing about labor and delivery, but further work is needed to determine the ideal dosing regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 544
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial
    Taher, S. E.
    Inder, J. W.
    Soltan, S. A.
    Eliahoo, J.
    Edmonds, D. K.
    Bennett, P. R.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (06) : 719 - 725
  • [32] A randomized trial of intracervical foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin compared to vaginal misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women
    Culver, J
    Strauss, R
    Brody, S
    Dorman, K
    Timlin, S
    McMahon, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S203 - S203
  • [33] Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Khalil, Safia
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03): : 307 - 310
  • [34] Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for labor induction at term: A randomized controlled trial
    Bebbington, M
    Schmuel, E
    Pevzner, L
    Bernstein, P
    Dayal, A
    Barnhard, J
    Chazotte, C
    Merkatz, I
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : S211 - S211
  • [35] THE EFFICIENCY OF PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 VAGINAL SUPPOSITORIES VERSUS INTRACERVICAL PROSTAGLANDIN GEL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR IN PATIENTS WITH UNFAVORABLE INDUCIBILITY PROSPECTS
    LEGARTH, J
    GULDBAEK, E
    SCHER, NJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1988, 27 (02): : 93 - 98
  • [36] Foley Catheter Versus Vaginal Prostaglandin E2 Gel for Induction of Labor at Term (PROBAAT Trial): An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Jozwiak, Marta
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Benthem, Marjan
    van Beek, Erik
    Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K.
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    van Huizen, Marloes E.
    Oudijk, Martijn A.
    Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
    Perquin, Denise A. M.
    Porath, Martina
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    Rijnders, Robbert J. P.
    Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
    Spaanderman, Marc E. A.
    van Pampus, Maria G.
    de Leeuw, Jan Willem
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2012, 67 (02) : 71 - 73
  • [37] CONTROLLED TRIAL OF INDUCTION OF LABOR BY VAGINAL SUPPOSITORIES CONTAINING PROSTAGLANDIN-E2
    LIGGINS, GC
    PROSTAGLANDINS, 1979, 18 (01): : 167 - 172
  • [38] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial
    Ezechukwu, Paschalina Constance
    Ugwu, Emmanuel Onyebuchi
    Obi, Samuel Nnamdi
    Chigbu, Chibuike Ogwuegbu
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (03) : 537 - 544
  • [39] Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial - In reply
    Cheng, Shi-Yann
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (06): : 1445 - 1445
  • [40] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial
    Paschalina Constance Ezechukwu
    Emmanuel Onyebuchi Ugwu
    Samuel Nnamdi Obi
    Chibuike Ogwuegbu Chigbu
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 537 - 544