The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Form of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Gulec, Huseyin [1 ]
Sayar, Kemal [2 ]
Gulec, Medine Yazici [1 ]
机构
[1] SB Erenky Ruh & Sinir Hast Egitim & Arastirma Ha, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bakirkoy Ruh Sagligi & Sinir Hastaliklari Hastan, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Somatization; Somatosensory Amplification Scale; reliability; validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: In this study, the authors aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS) that was developed by Barsky et al. in the Turkish population. Method: The study was carried out with 42 patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome and Asthma Diseases attending to outpatient Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation and Chest Diseases clinics and 86 healthy students from Karadeniz Technical Univercity (KTU). Results: SSAS scores were normally distributed, and had acceptable test-retest reliability (r: 0.73) and internal consistency (a, 0.62-0.76). Item to scale correlations varied from 0.10 to 0.72, and most were highly significant. Whereas, one item (item 1) in the control group and one item (item 2) in the patient group had low item-total score correlation (r<0.15). Criterion related validity of SSAS was shown with significant correlation between Symptom Interpretation Questionnaire, Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Symptom Check List 90 Revised somatization subscale. The validity analysis of the scale resulted in a very high significant difference (p<0.01) between the mean SSAS scores of the control and the patient group. Discussion: ITest-retest, internal reliability, and item-total score correlation, discriminating power for specific groups and criterion related validity of the SSAS show that the scale has acceptable reliability and validity for the Turkish population.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Fibrofatigue Scale
    Kulcu, Duygu Geler
    Akbas, Berfu
    Bicakcigil, Muge
    Gulsen, Gulcin
    Yavuzer, Gunes
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN, 2010, 18 (02): : 159 - 166
  • [42] The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Pet Attitude Scale
    Akyil, Rahsan Cevik
    Saritas, Seyhan Citlik
    Kahraman, Aysegul
    Akyil, Musa Samil
    Abacigil, Filiz
    MEANDROS MEDICAL AND DENTAL JOURNAL, 2022, 23 (01): : 94 - 100
  • [43] Turkish validity and reliability of the COVERS pain scale
    Incekar, Mujde Calikusu
    Ogut, Nehir Ulu
    Mutlu, Birsen
    Cecen, Eda
    Can, Emrah
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 67 (06): : 882 - 888
  • [44] Turkish validity and reliability of the postpartum stressors scale
    Sahbaz, Gamze
    Erbil, Nulufer
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (02) : 350 - 361
  • [45] Creative Mindsets Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability
    Karakelle, Sema
    Sarac, Seda
    CYPRUS TURKISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 4 (02): : 122 - 129
  • [46] Functions of Identity Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability
    Demir, Ilkay
    KURAM VE UYGULAMADA EGITIM BILIMLERI, 2011, 11 (02): : 579 - 586
  • [47] Turkish validity and reliability of coronavirus anxiety scale
    Isik, Nurten Arslan
    Celik, Gulden Kucukakca
    Ayran, Gulsun
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 41 (08) : 5612 - 5620
  • [48] Validity and reliability of Turkish form of children's self-efficacy scale on Turkish primary school students
    Basol, Gulsah
    INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 2 (02): : 4082 - 4086
  • [49] Reliability and Validity of Attentional Style Questionnaire: Turkish Form
    Yuksel, Muge
    Ozturk Belet, Eda
    Acar Bulut, Ozlem
    Nurlu, Merve
    Cetintas, Seyda
    HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2024, 39 (02): : 252 - 259
  • [50] The validity and reliability of the Turkish Form of Recovery Process Inventory
    Yalciner, Nihan
    Turkmen, Sevgi Nehir
    Irmak, Hatice
    Tavsanli, Nurgul Gungor
    Elma, Filiz
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 20 : 32 - 40