Limitations of real-world treatment with atorvastatin monotherapy for lowering LDL-C in high-risk cardiovascular patients in the US

被引:11
|
作者
Marrett, Elizabeth [1 ]
Zhao, Changgeng [1 ]
Zhang, Ning Jackie [2 ]
Zhang, Qiaoyi [1 ]
Ramey, Dena R. [1 ]
Tomassini, Joanne E. [1 ]
Tershakovec, Andrew M. [1 ]
Neff, David R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Merck & Co Inc, Whitehouse Stn, NJ USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Hlth & Publ Affairs, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
statin therapy; managed-care; lipid-lowering therapy;
D O I
10.2147/VHRM.S54886
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Guidelines endorse statin therapy for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to recommended levels, in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, if needed, after lifestyle changes. Atorvastatin is a common statin with greater LDL-C lowering efficacy than most other statins; its availability in generic form will likely increase its use. This study assessed attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C levels in high-risk CVD patients treated with atorvastatin monotherapy. Methods: Analyses of two retrospective US cohorts of patients who received a prescription for atorvastatin monotherapy between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010 (index date defined as first prescription date) in the GE Centricity Electronic Medical Record (EMR) (N=10,693) and Humana Medicare (N=16,798) databases. Eligible patients were >= 18 years, diagnosed with coronary heart disease or atherosclerotic vascular disease, with >1 LDL-C measurement between 3 months and 1 year postindex date, and continuously enrolled for 1 year prior to and following the index date. Results: Of the eligible patients, 21.8%, 29.6%, 29.9%, and 18.7% (GE Centricity EMR) and 25.4%, 32.9%, 27.8%, and 14.0% (Humana Medicare) received 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg doses of atorvastatin, respectively. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) follow-up LDL-C levels were 2.1 +/- 0.8 mmol/L (83 +/- 30 mg/dL) and 2.3 +/- 0.8 mmol/L (88 +/- 31 mg/dL) for the GE Centricity EMR and Humana Medicare cohorts, respectively. Regardless of dose, only 28.3%-34.8% of patients had LDL-C levels,1.8 mmol/L (, 70 mg/dL), and 72.0%-78.0% achieved LDL-C,2.6 mmol/L (, 100 mg/dL) in both cohorts. As many as 41% and 13% of patients had LDL-C levels >= 0.5 mmol/L (>= 20 mg/dL) above LDL-C 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) and 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL), respectively, in both cohorts; these percentages were generally similar across atorvastatin doses. Conclusion: In this real-world US setting, a large number of high-risk CVD patients did not attain guideline-recommended LDL-C levels with atorvastatin monotherapy. More than 65% of the patients had LDL-C levels.1.8 mmol/L (. 70 mg/dL), and of these, 30%-40% had LDL-C levels $ 0.5 mmol/L ($ 20 mg/dL) above this, regardless of dose. This suggests that more effective lipid-lowering strategies, such as statin uptitration, switching to a higher efficacy statin, and/or combination therapy, may be required to achieve optimal LDL-C lowering in high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 246
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of statin therapy, LDL-C levels, and cardiovascular events among high-risk patients in the United States
    Unni, Sudhir K.
    Quek, Ruben G. W.
    Biskupiak, Joseph
    Lee, Vinson C.
    Ye, Xiangyang
    Gandra, Shravanthi R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2016, 10 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [22] LDL-C TREATMENT GAPS IN STATIN-TREATED PATIENTS AT HIGH AND VERY HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN EUROPE
    Gitt, A. K.
    Ambegaonkar, B.
    Brudi, P.
    Lautsch, D.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2014, 235 (02) : E106 - E106
  • [23] Repeat cardiovascular-related procedures and real-world treatment in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia
    Lehrke, Michael
    Mueller, Sabrina
    Maywald, Ulf
    Deiters, Barthold
    Fraass, Uwe
    Stein, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 27 (01) : 1583 - 1596
  • [24] Plasma LDL-C goal achievement with Atorvastatin Monotherapy versus Atorvastatin and Probucol combination therapy in patients with coronary atherosclerosis
    Binaykumar, Adhikari
    Zhang Sisi
    Meng, Xiaoping
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (16) : C203 - C203
  • [25] Three decades of glucose-lowering therapy in patients at high cardiovascular risk - A real-world analysis
    Neyer, Magdalena
    Vogel, Johannes B.
    Elsner, Pascal
    Kuehrer, Heike
    Saely, Christoph H.
    Muendlein, Axel
    Vonbank, Alexander
    Mader, Arthur
    Festa, Andreas
    Drexel, Heinz
    Leiherer, Andreas
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024,
  • [26] Evaluating LDL-C control in Indian acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients- A retrospective real-world study LDL-C control in ACS
    Jain, Madhur
    Sawant, Rahul
    Panchal, Hitanshu
    Anand, S.
    Jena, Anupam
    Gupta, Rahul
    Kumar, Karthik
    Jambunathan, Rajagopal
    Modi, Sunil
    Mullasari, Ajit
    Sinha, Nakul
    Shetty, Kimi
    Kawatra, Pallavi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY CARDIOVASCULAR RISK AND PREVENTION, 2023, 19
  • [27] LDL-C LOWERING EFFICACY OF EVOLOCUMAB (AMG 145) COULD REDUCE APHERESIS IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK FOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN GERMANY
    Villa, G.
    Schmid, T.
    Lothgren, M.
    Michailov, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A504 - A504
  • [28] A US Claims-Based Analysis of Real-World Lipid-Lowering Treatment Patterns in Patients With High Cardiovascular Disease Risk or a Previous Coronary Event
    Quek, Ruben G. W.
    Fox, Kathleen M.
    Wang, Li
    Li, Lu
    Gandra, Shravanthi R.
    Wong, Nathan D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 117 (04): : 495 - 500
  • [29] Under-treated high-risk patients: identifying patients in high-risk subgroups and treating them to LDL-C targets
    Schuster, H
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 7 (0A) : A20 - A28
  • [30] REAL-WORLD STATIN UTILIZATION AMONG PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK FOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS: US ANALYSES
    Lin, I
    Sung, J. C.
    Sanchez, R.
    Mallya, U. G.
    Friedman, M.
    Panaccio, M.
    Koren, A.
    Neumann, P. J.
    Menzin, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A152 - A152