ENERGY DEPOSITION IN X-RAY CCDS AND CHARGED-PARTICLE DISCRIMINATION

被引:4
|
作者
OWENS, A
MCCARTHY, KJ
机构
[1] Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0168-9002(95)00603-6
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
We report the results of investigation into ionization energy loss in X-ray CCDs and the ability of fast protons to masquerade as X-ray events by their energy and spatial signatures. The study was made to explore background contamination in X-ray detectors intended to operate in the mixed radiation environment of space. It was carried out using the ionization energy loss code of Hall [1] which includes atomic electron binding effects. Three devices were considered in our study; a front illuminated 35 mu m deep depletion device developed for the Joint European X-ray Telescope, and two CCDs baselined for ESA's XMM mission - a PN device of active depth 280 mu m and a back-illuminated MOS device of active depth 90 mu m It was found that for the JET-X device, 4.9% of minimally ionizing protons deposit less than 10 keV in the active volume of the CCD. Whilst the frequency distribution of such events versus energy deposited increases up to a peak energy of similar to 9 keV, the number having a morphology consistent with X-ray events simultaneously decreases. Thus, when coupled with the requirement that events should extend no more than 2 pixels spatially, the fraction of masquerading events drops to 0.016%. The analysis was also carried out for the two XMM CCDs. For the PN device the fraction of events depositing less than 15 keV is miniscule whereas almost 4% of events were recorded for the MOS device. When coupled with an event size requirement of less than or equal to 2 pixels, the fraction of events falls to 1 X 10(-9). A surprising result of the present work is that the ability of a CCD to discriminate against minimally ionizing particles is dependent on pixel size. For a JET-X like device this varies by a factor 10 for pixel sizes ranging from 13 to 35 mu m on a side. In fact, the optimum pixel size for both the JET-X and XMM MOS devices was found to be near 40 mu m. We conclude that given the energy deposition and morphological distinctions between photon and particle events, CCDs used in X-ray astronomy can be optimally designed to provide simultaneously the highest signal-to-noise ratios for X-rays and rejection ratios for charged particles.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Monte-Carlo modeling of monolithic CMOS sensors for X-ray and charged-particle imaging
    Li, Shengdong
    Matis, Howard S.
    Kleinfelder, Stuart
    PENETRATING RADIATION SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS VIII, 2007, 6707
  • [22] Two approaches for irradiating cells individually: A charged-particle microbeam and a soft X-ray microprobe
    Folkard, Melvyn
    Vojnovic, Boris
    Schettino, Giuseppe
    Forsberg, Mats
    Bowey, Graeme
    Prise, Kevin M.
    Michael, Barry D.
    Michette, Alan G.
    Pfauntsch, Slawka J.
    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 1997, 130 (1-4): : 270 - 274
  • [23] TRACE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY CHARGED-PARTICLE INDUCED X-RAY EXCITATION
    WHEELER, RM
    LIEBERT, RB
    MILJANIC, D
    PHILLIPS, GC
    VALKOVIC, V
    ZABEL, T
    WITHERS, RH
    MILAS, L
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1973, 18 (04): : 634 - 634
  • [24] Two approaches for irradiating cells individually: a charged-particle microbeam and a soft X-ray microprobe
    Folkard, M
    Vojnovic, B
    Schettino, G
    Forsberg, M
    Bowey, G
    Prise, KM
    Michael, BD
    Michette, AG
    Pfauntsch, SJ
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 1997, 130 (1-4): : 270 - 274
  • [25] Monte Carlo charged-particle tracking and energy deposition on a Lagrangian mesh
    Yuan, J
    Moses, GA
    McKenty, PW
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2005, 72 (04):
  • [26] CHARGED-PARTICLE RAY SIMULATOR AND MONITOR
    KISKER, E
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1983, 54 (09): : 1113 - 1116
  • [27] PRODUCTION OF CO BY CHARGED-PARTICLE DEPOSITION MECHANISMS
    GREEN, AES
    SAWADA, T
    UMAN, MA
    EDGAR, BC
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1972, 53 (11): : 1063 - &
  • [28] Charged-particle and focused soft X-ray microbeams for investigating individual and collective radiation responses of cells
    Michael, BD
    Held, KD
    Schettino, G
    Folkard, M
    Prise, KM
    Vojnovic, B
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2001, 156 (04) : 439 - 440
  • [29] ENERGY ANALYZERS FOR CHARGED-PARTICLE BEAMS
    STECKELM.W
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS E-SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1973, 6 (11): : 1061 - 1071
  • [30] Multilayer X-ray sensitive CCDs
    Skrylev, AS
    Skrylev, PA
    Shilin, VA
    SECOND CONFERENCE ON PHOTONICS FOR TRANSPORTATION, 2002, 4761 : 215 - 225