WHAT IS THE TRUE FILM-SCREEN SENSITIVITY

被引:0
|
作者
WARRENFORWARD, HM
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A system for measuring the film-screen sensitivity has been described using an X ray source. A single film was used to assess the variation in speed when exposed to four different accelerating potentials: 60 kV(p), 80 kV(p), 90 kV, and 110 kV(p). These were chosen to cover the range of applied potentials used for chest radiography in the West Midlands. Two sets of measurements were carried out. Firstly a standard him-screen cassette combination was used in order to investigate variations in processor performance. Measurements were then carried out on thirteen different film-screen processor combinations to assess differences between the nominal speed quoted by the manufacturer and the speed actually obtained in each hospital. For the standard system of nominal speed 400, the minimum speed was 282 and the maximum was calculated to be 689, a range factor of 2.44. The median speed increased by 33% as the kV(p) was increased - 387 at 60 kV(p) to 512 at 110 kV(p). The measurement of film-screen processing systems using the hospital's own film-screen system produced speeds closer to the nominal values than those variations when the standard film-screen combination was used. The maximum variation was calculated to be 33%. The measured values in speeds at nominal 300 and 400 were very close in value, with four of the five speeds at 400 being within the measured range of values at nominal 300. There was only an overall difference of 15% in the average speed between the two groups rather than the 33% expected.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 304
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A PHANTOM FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF CONTRAST DETAIL PERFORMANCE IN FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY
    THOMPSON, SR
    FAULKNER, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (767): : 1049 - 1055
  • [42] Microcalcification -: Is digital luminescence mammography Equal to film-screen systems?
    Aichinger, U
    Krämer, S
    Wilhelmi, U
    Schulz-Wendtland, R
    Bautz, W
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 9 - 12
  • [43] PATIENT DOSES AND RADIATION RISKS IN FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY IN FINLAND
    SERVOMAA, A
    PARVIAINEN, T
    KOMPPA, T
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1995, 57 (1-4) : 449 - 454
  • [44] THE PERFORMANCE OF THE IMAGE RECEPTOR WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO FILM-SCREEN COMBINATIONS
    MOORES, BM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1981, 54 (645): : 823 - 823
  • [45] Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography RESPONSE
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Hubbard, Rebecca
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 156 (03) : 251 - 251
  • [46] USE OF AN ASYMMETRIC FILM-SCREEN COMBINATION FOR IMAGING PULMONARY NODULES
    MULLER, RD
    WAHLING, S
    HIRCHE, H
    VOSS, M
    GOCKE, P
    GOCKE, C
    BLENDL, C
    TUROWSKI, B
    BUDDENBROCK, B
    JOHN, V
    WIEBRINGHAUS, R
    PLAJER, T
    WEGENERPANZER, A
    BOSCH, E
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1995, 163 (04): : 290 - 296
  • [47] AN EVALUATION OF 4 RARE-EARTH FILM-SCREEN COMBINATIONS
    NETTLE, JRL
    RITCHINGS, RT
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1980, 53 (634): : 965 - 968
  • [48] METHODS OF EVALUATING X-RAY FILM-SCREEN COMBINATIONS
    GORE, JC
    HOOKER, GR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1978, 51 (603): : 234 - 234
  • [49] Conventional Film-Screen Principles of Exposure Selection in the Digital Age
    Steward, Adam
    Tarollo, Michael
    Mandarano, Giovanni
    Lombardi, Carla
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 89 (05) : 488 - 494
  • [50] ON THE MEASUREMENT OF HALF-VALUE LAYER IN FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY
    WAGNER, LK
    ARCHER, BR
    CERRA, F
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (06) : 989 - 997