Wastewater Collection System Optimization for Cost-Effective and Sustainable Capital Improvement Planning

被引:0
|
作者
Wilson, J. I. [1 ]
Smith, P. J. [1 ]
Witt, A. [2 ]
Canning, M. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Optimat Pty Ltd, 11-202 Glen Osmond Rd, Fullarton, SA 5063, Australia
[2] Johnson Cty Wastewater, Olathe, KS 66061 USA
[3] Optimat LLC, Chicago, IL 60631 USA
来源
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2010年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
Climate change; genetic algorithm optimization; inflow and infiltration reduction; multi-criteria analysis; sewer overflows; wastewater collection system planning;
D O I
10.2166/WPT.2010.080
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
One of the greatest challenges facing water utilities when developing wastewater planning strategies is to find solutions that are not only cost effective in the short term but that also provide the desired level of service over the life of the infrastructure. Uncertainties in future population forecasts, climate change impacts, rates of system deterioration and accuracy of hydraulic model calibration can have a significant impact on planning solutions. A powerful new decision-support approach is now being used to evaluate wastewater collection system improvement alternatives and select cost effective inflow and infiltration (I/I) reduction targets. This planning approach assists wastewater management professionals in developing capital improvement plans which meet affordability constraints while maintaining sufficient flexibility to accommodate future uncertainties. This paper describes the application of genetic algorithm (GA) optimization to collection system master planning and gives an overview of how it has been used by Johnson County Wastewater (JCW) since 2007 for planning upgrades to the Turkey Creek wastewater collection system in Kansas, USA.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Drafting a cost-effective approach towards a sustainable manufacturing system design
    Nujoom, Reda
    Mohammed, Ahmed
    Wang, Qian
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 133 : 317 - 330
  • [22] COST-EFFECTIVE REHABILITATION OF A WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANT
    HARRIS, PG
    STEELE, ME
    PUBLIC WORKS, 1983, 114 (10): : 78 - 79
  • [23] Cost-effective pre-treatment of wastewater
    El-Gohary, FA
    Nasr, FA
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (05) : 97 - 103
  • [24] COST-EFFECTIVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY.
    Dagdigian, Jeffrey V.
    Wire Journal International, 1988, 21 (05): : 59 - 61
  • [25] A Multi-Objective Optimization Scheme for Resilient, Cost-Effective Planning of Microgrids
    Borghei, Moein
    Ghassemi, Mona
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 206325 - 206341
  • [26] Performance of fungal blood cultures by using the isolator collection system: Is it cost-effective?
    Morrell, RM
    Wasilauskas, BL
    Steffee, CH
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (12) : 3040 - 3043
  • [27] Reliable, cost-effective and sustainable water supply
    不详
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2025, 238 (01) : 65 - 65
  • [28] Cost-effective system management
    Schaller, S
    ASTRONOMICAL DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS VII (ADASS), 1998, 145 : 139 - 141
  • [29] Sustainable and cost-effective monitoring of patients on ART
    Gibb, Diana M.
    Mugyenyi, Peter
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2014, 2 (01): : E4 - E5
  • [30] Cost-Effective and Ecologically Sustainable Carbon Nano-Onions for Antibiotic Removal from Wastewater
    Kumari, Poonam
    Tripathi, Kumud Malika
    Awasthi, Kamlendra
    Gupta, Ragini
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 62 (35) : 13837 - 13847