Capital project performance measurement and benchmarking in Singapore

被引:20
|
作者
Hwang, Bon-Gang [1 ]
Tan, Hui [2 ]
Sathish, Sowmya [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Bldg, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Land Transport Author, Singapore, Singapore
[3] ZEB Technol Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Performance measurement; Benchmarking; Construction industry; Singapore;
D O I
10.1108/09699981311303017
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify the implementation status of performance measurement and benchmarking in the Singapore construction industry and to provide some suggestions to increase the scale of implementation in these two areas. Design/methodology/approach - A comprehensive literature review was first carried out, then a questionnaire was developed and 32 contractor firms participated in the survey. Findings - It was found that contractor firms in Singapore do not practice performance measurement on a regular basis and there is no uniformity in calculation of performance metrics, leading to low usage of benchmarking. Research limitations/implications - One of the limitations faced during this study was the low number of companies that responded. Another limitation is that the size of projects analyzed tended to be focused towards a relatively small and medium scale. Practical implications - Development of a standardized performance measurement and benchmarking system in Singapore is required. Also, common definitions are vital to enable uniform data collection and the meaningful comparison of performance. Originality/value - This study will help the Singapore construction industry to remain competitive internationally and to continue to attract foreign investors for its capital projects.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving building project performance: how buildability benchmarking can help
    Lam, Patrick T. I.
    Wong, Franky W. H.
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 27 (01) : 41 - 52
  • [42] Analysis of the Usage of the CII/COAA Benchmarking and Project Performance Assessment System
    Ikpe, Elias
    Kumar, Jatinder
    Jergeas, George
    [J]. PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 20 (04)
  • [43] Performance measurement, benchmarking and the UK library and information services sector
    Garrod, P
    Kinnell, M
    [J]. LIBRI, 1996, 46 (03): : 141 - 148
  • [44] The evolution of a performance measurement project at RTZ
    Pauley, GS
    Ormerod, RJ
    [J]. INTERFACES, 1998, 28 (04) : 94 - 118
  • [45] A performance measurement view of IT project management
    de Oliveira Lacerda, Rogerio Tadeu
    Ensslin, Leonardo
    Ensslin, Sandra Rolim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 60 (02) : 132 - +
  • [46] The public project performance measurement model
    Qin, Guowen
    Yi, Wei
    Yan, Yanmei
    Li, Lin
    [J]. Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 2900 - 2906
  • [47] Benchmarking of Measurement and Performance Evaluation Methods for Third Sector Organizations
    Santos Constantin Raptopoulos, Maria Madalena
    da Silva, Jorge Ferreira
    [J]. ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA E GESTAO SOCIAL, 2020, 12 (04):
  • [48] Strategic performance measurement and the use of capital subsidies
    Tzelepis, Dimitris
    Skuras, Dimitris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 55 (07) : 527 - 538
  • [49] Performance measurement, intellectual capital and financial sustainability
    Dias Jordao, Ricardo Vinicius
    de Almeida, Vander Ribeiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2017, 18 (03) : 643 - 666
  • [50] Intellectual capital and performance measurement systems in Iran
    Asiaei, Kaveh
    Jusoh, Ruzita
    Bontis, Nick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2018, 19 (02) : 294 - 320