DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF CISAPRIDE AND CIMETIDINE IN TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS

被引:69
|
作者
GALMICHE, JP
FRAITAG, B
FILOCHE, B
EVREUX, M
VITAUX, J
ZEITOUN, P
FOURNET, J
SOULE, JC
机构
[1] HOP ROBERT DEBRE,REIMS,FRANCE
[2] CTR HOSP ST PHILIBERT,LOMME,FRANCE
[3] HOP ALBERT MICHALLON,GRENOBLE,FRANCE
[4] HOP HOTEL DIEU,F-69002 LYONS,FRANCE
[5] HOP HENRI MONDOR,F-94010 CRETEIL,FRANCE
关键词
cimetidine; cisapride; esophagitis; gastroesophageal reflux;
D O I
10.1007/BF01540415
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
In a double-blind, randomized, comparative trial of the prokinetic drug cisapride and the H2-blocker cimetidine, mucosal healing and changes in symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were evaluated in patients with erosive reflux esophagitis. The patients were treated with either cisapride, 10 mg four times a day (N=36) or cimetidine, 400 mg four times a day (N=37) for six weeks, or for 12 weeks if mucosal healing was not obtained by week 6. Upon entry, two thirds of the patients in each group had grade I (Savary-Miller) esophagitis, and the remainder grade II or III. At the end of treatment, endoscopy showed mucosal healing in 56% (38-72%; 95% confidence interval) of cisapride and 57% (39-73%; 95% confidence interval) of cimetidine patients. After six weeks, both drugs significantly (P<0.01) decreased the intensity and frequency of heartburn, regurgitation, and the postural syndrome. No significant inter group differences were found regarding endoscopic parameters or the improvement of heartburn and regurgitation. Concomitant antacid use was also comparable. Adverse effects were reported by four cisapride and nine cimetidine patients. These results indicate that the effects of cisapride compare well with those of cimetidine in terms of both esophageal mucosal healing and symptom relief. © 1990 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 655
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CIMETIDINE VERSUS ANTACID IN SCLERODERMA WITH REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS, A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED-STUDY
    PETROKUBI, RJ
    JEFFRIES, GH
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1978, 74 (05) : 1077 - 1077
  • [22] OMEPRAZOLE AND RANITIDINE IN TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE TRIAL
    HAVELUND, T
    LAURSEN, LS
    SKOUBOKRISTENSEN, E
    ANDERSEN, BN
    PEDERSEN, SA
    JENSEN, KB
    FENGER, C
    HANBERGSORENSEN, F
    LAURITSEN, K
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 296 (6615): : 89 - 92
  • [23] OMEPRAZOLE AND RANITIDINE IN TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE TRIAL
    HAVELUND, T
    LAURSEN, LS
    SKOUBOKRISTENSEN, E
    ANDERSEN, BN
    PEDERSEN, SA
    JENSEN, KB
    FENGER, C
    HANBERGSORENSEN, F
    LAURITSEN, K
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 94 (05) : A177 - A177
  • [24] RANITIDINE AND PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    GOY, JA
    MAYNARD, JH
    MCNAUGHTON, WM
    OSHEA, A
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1983, 2 (11) : 558 - 561
  • [25] COMPARISON BETWEEN RANITIDINE AND CIMETIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
    FIELDING, JF
    DOYLE, GD
    [J]. IRISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 77 (11) : 356 - 357
  • [26] ENDOSCOPIC AND CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF CISAPRIDE AND CIMETIDINE IN REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
    EVREUX, M
    FOURNET, J
    GALMICHE, JP
    SOULE, J
    VITAUX, J
    ZEITOUN, P
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 94 (05) : A120 - A120
  • [27] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF RANITIDINE AND CIMETIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF DUODENAL ULCERATION
    SAUNDERS, JHB
    PEDEN, NR
    BOYD, EJS
    WORMSLEY, KG
    [J]. GUT, 1980, 21 (05) : A455 - A455
  • [28] TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS WITH CIMETIDINE
    LEPSIEN, G
    SONNENBERG, A
    BERGES, W
    WEBER, KB
    WIENBECK, M
    SIEWERT, JR
    BLUM, AL
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1979, 104 (25) : 901 - 906
  • [29] CIMETIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
    BROWN, P
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1979, 2 (02) : 96 - 97
  • [30] RANITIDINE IN REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - A DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL
    GOY, JAE
    MAYNARD, J
    MCNAUGHTON, W
    OSHEA, A
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 13 (03): : 319 - 319