TREATMENT OF GRAM-NEGATIVE SEPTIC SHOCK WITH AN IMMUNOGLOBULIN PREPARATION - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL

被引:190
|
作者
SCHEDEL, I
DREIKHAUSEN, U
NENTWIG, B
HOCKENSCHNIEDER, M
RAUTHMANN, D
BALIKCIOGLU, S
COLDEWEY, R
DEICHER, H
机构
[1] Dept. of Clinical Immunology, Internal Medical Division, Hannover Medical School, Hannover
关键词
IMMUNOGLOBINS; SHOCK; SEPTIC; SEPTICEMIA; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA; ENDOTOXINS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; LIMULUS TEST; MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURE; ANTIBODIES;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-199109000-00003
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a polyclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) preparation containing IgG, IgM, and IgA as an adjunctive therapy for septic shock. Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Setting: A clinical immunology ward at the center for internal medicine in a university hospital. Patients: Fifty-five patients with septic shock were randomly allocated to two groups according to criteria of septic shock. Intervention: One group of patients (n = 27) received a commercially available immunoglobulin preparation (containing high titers of antibodies specific for determinants to bacterial endotoxin) during the first 3 days after inclusion in the study. The other randomized group (n = 28) did not receive any immunoglobulin preparation. Measurements and Main Results: During the period of less-than-or-equal-to 6 wks after the beginning of clinically apparent septic shock, death related to the septic process occurred in one (4%) of 27 patients who received immunoglobulin. By comparison, nine (32%) of 28 control group patients died during this period (p < .01). Within the first 48 hrs after onset of the clinically apparent septic process, significantly increased activity of circulating endotoxin and simultaneously decreased specific IgG serum titers to lipid A were detected in the group of nonsurvivors. Conclusions: Administration of a polyclonal immunoglobulin preparation in the early phase of septic shock was associated with significantly improved survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1104 / 1113
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Monotherapy Is Adequate for Septic Shock Due to Gram-Negative Organisms
    Klompas, Michael
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (11) : 1930 - 1932
  • [32] SIGNIFICANCE OF ENDOTOXIN DETERMINATION IN GRAM-NEGATIVE HYPERDYNAMIC SEPTIC SHOCK
    WITTE, J
    RUCKDESCHEL, G
    YIN, ET
    MESSMER, K
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE, 1981, 355 : 653 - 653
  • [33] The pathogenic role of LBP in gram-negative sepsis and septic shock
    Heumann, D
    Lengacher, S
    Le Roy, D
    Jongeneel, CV
    Glauser, MP
    ENDOTOXIN AND SEPSIS: MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF PATHOGENESIS, HOST RESISTANCE, AND THERAPY, 1998, 397 : 379 - 386
  • [34] GRAM-NEGATIVE PNEUMONIA PRODUCES A HYPERDYNAMIC SEPTIC SHOCK SYNDROME
    KEENAN, R
    TODD, T
    GIROTTI, M
    CIRCULATORY SHOCK, 1987, 21 (04) : 365 - 365
  • [35] Severe sepsis and septic shock: The role of gram-negative bacteremia
    Munford, Robert S.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PATHOLOGY-MECHANISMS OF DISEASE, 2006, 1 (01) : 467 - 496
  • [36] Negatively controlled, randomized clinical trial to evaluate intramammary treatment of nonsevere, gram-negative clinical mastitis
    Fuenzalida, M. J.
    Ruegg, P. L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (06) : 5438 - 5457
  • [37] PASSIVE IMMUNOTHERAPY OF GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTEREMIA, SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK
    SPAPEN, HD
    DILTOER, M
    HUYGHENS, LP
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 1993, 48 (01): : 20 - 29
  • [38] Alteco endotoxin hemoadsorption in Gram-negative septic shock patients
    HP Shum
    KC Chan
    WW Yan
    Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):
  • [39] COMPARISON OF SEPTIC SHOCK DUE TO GRAM-NEGATIVE AND GRAM-POSITIVE ORGANISMS
    GUENTER, CA
    HINSHAW, LB
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1970, 134 (03): : 780 - &
  • [40] Alteco endotoxin hemoadsorption in Gram-negative septic shock patients
    Shum, Hoi Ping
    Leung, Yuk Wah
    Lam, Sin Man
    Chan, King Chung
    Yan, Wing Wa
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 18 (12) : 783 - 788