SELECTION AND SELF-SELECTION AT GERMAN MASS UNIVERSITIES

被引:12
|
作者
WINDOLF, P
机构
[1] Department of Sociology, University of Trier
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0305498950210206
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In many countries university expansion in recent decades has led to a process of institutional differentiation between mass and elite universities, between state and private universities, and between long- and short-term courses. Selection into these different types of higher education is practised not only by the university itself, since the students subject themselves to a certain self-selection. The effect of both forms of selection is to reproduce the institutional differentiation of the level of the university in a social differentiation at the level of the student body. The data analysed here are from a survey conducted during the winter semester 1989-1990 among university beginners at three German universities with the following results: (1) Students enrolling in various subjects differ substantially from one another in terms of motives, expectations regarding future career, and cognitive abilities. As the survey was carried out among those just beginning their studies, the differences observed cannot be attributed to subject-specific socialisation processes (professionalisation) but must be due to the factor of selection alone. (2) Students do not distinguish themselves from one another across universities. Controlling for the overall set of subjects taught at the particular universities, differences in the characteristics of those enrolled in different universities are not statistically significant. This finding confirms the homogeneity of German universities. (3) The values and norms instilled in the context of family and school socialisation provide the best explanation for the choice of subject and the selection process at the university.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 231
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Self-selection and analyst coverage
    McNichols, M
    O'Brien, PC
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1997, 35 : 167 - 199
  • [22] DIETARY SELF-SELECTION BY LAYERS
    LEESON, S
    SUMMERS, JD
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1979, 58 (03) : 646 - 651
  • [23] SELF-SELECTION OF FOOD BY CHILDREN
    Davis, Clara M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1935, 35 (05) : 403 - 410
  • [24] SELECTION AND SELF-SELECTION OF RESPONDENTS IN SAMPLE-SURVEYS
    THART, H
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1976, 12 (01): : 39 - 45
  • [25] DIETARY SELF-SELECTION BY ANIMALS
    OVERMANN, SR
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (02) : 218 - 235
  • [26] Self-Selection of Accessibility Options
    Santhanam, Nithin
    Trewin, Shari
    Swart, Cal
    Santhanam, P.
    ASSETS 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, 2011, : 277 - 278
  • [27] On Negligence Rules and Self-Selection
    Miceli, Thomas J.
    REVIEW OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2006, 2 (03) : 349 - 361
  • [28] Schooling, self-selection, and obesity
    Nayga, RM
    CONSUMER INTERESTS ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOL. 46, 2000, : 13 - 16
  • [29] SELF-SELECTION AND THE EFFICIENCY OF TOURNAMENTS
    Eriksson, Tor
    Teyssier, Sabrina
    Villeval, Marie-Claire
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2009, 47 (03) : 530 - 548
  • [30] Self-selection consistent functions
    Barberà, S
    Beviá, C
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2002, 105 (02) : 263 - 277