Evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the York Faecal Calprotectin Care Pathway

被引:24
|
作者
Turvill, James [1 ]
Turnock, Daniel [2 ]
Holmes, Hayden [3 ]
Jones, Alison [2 ]
Mclaughlan, Eleanor [4 ]
Hilton, Victoria [5 ]
Marriott, Stacey [6 ]
机构
[1] York Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, York Hosp, York YO31 8HE, N Yorkshire, England
[2] York Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Clin Biochem, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] York Hlth Econ Consortium Ltd, York, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Leeds Gen Infirm, Dept Blood Sci, Old Med Sch, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Yorkshire & Humber Acad Hlth Sci Network, Wakefield, England
[6] NHS Vale York Clin Commissioning Grp, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/flgastro-2018-100962
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the York Faecal Calprotectin Care Pathway (YFCCP) and undertake a health economics analysis. The YFCCP has been introduced in support of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance DG11. It is designed to improve the sensitivity and specificity of faecal calprotectin (FC) in discriminating the irritable bowel syndrome from inflammatory bowel disease in primary care. Design To prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes at 6 months of the first 1005 patients entering the YFCCP. To develop a cost-consequence model using two comparators: one based on clinical assessment and the C reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate without using FC, and the second using single testing of the standard FC cut-off. Setting North Yorkshire primary care practices. Patients Primary care patients fulfilling NICE DG11. Interventions The YFCCP. Main outcome measures Clinical outcome measures from secondary care records. Results The sensitivity and specificity of the YFCCP are 0.94 (0.85 to 0.98) and 0.92 (0.90 to 0.94), giving a negative and positive predictive value of 0.99 (0.98 to 1.0) and 0.51 (0.43 to 0.59), respectively. Conclusions The YFCCP overcomes the challenges experienced with FC use in primary care, its efficacy matching initial NICE projections. It is readily incorporated into clinical practice. It should represent the framework on which to increase NICE DG11 implementation nationally.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 294
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The generic cost-effectiveness of health care
    Meerding, M. J.
    Mackenbach, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A366 - A367
  • [42] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPROVED OUTPATIENT CARE
    COLE, CM
    IRISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 74 (09) : 254 - 255
  • [43] TRENDS IN THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF STROKE CARE
    Urbina-Valdespino, E.
    Saka, O.
    Crichton, S.
    Rudd, A.
    Mcguire, A.
    Wolfe, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A520 - A520
  • [44] A COST-EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF PRIMARY HEALTH-CARE PROJECTS FOR THE POOR
    BEGLEY, CE
    DOWD, CM
    MCCANDLESS, R
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1989, 12 (04) : 437 - 452
  • [45] CARE OF ACNE - A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    STERN, RS
    PASS, TM
    KOMAROFF, AL
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 28 (02): : A300 - A300
  • [46] Costs and cost-effectiveness of periviable care
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Burchfield, David J.
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 38 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [47] ECONOMIC-EVALUATION AND HEALTH-CARE - COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    ROBINSON, R
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6907): : 793 - 795
  • [48] The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation
    Pavey, T. G.
    Anokye, N.
    Taylor, A. H.
    Trueman, P.
    Moxham, T.
    Fox, K. R.
    Hillsdon, M.
    Green, C.
    Campbell, J. L.
    Foster, C.
    Mutrie, N.
    Searle, J.
    Taylor, R. S.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 15 (44) : 1 - +
  • [49] Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a systematic review and economic evaluation
    Moore, David J.
    Adi, Yaser
    Connock, Martin J.
    Bayliss, Sue
    BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2009, 9 : 20
  • [50] Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a systematic review and economic evaluation
    David J Moore
    Yaser Adi
    Martin J Connock
    Sue Bayliss
    BMC Endocrine Disorders, 9