A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF OBJECT DEFINITION TECHNIQUES FOR LARGE PROTOTYPE SYSTEMS

被引:4
|
作者
WILEDEN, JC [1 ]
CLARKE, LA [1 ]
WOLF, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] AT&T BELL LABS,MURRAY HILL,NJ 07974
来源
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS | 1990年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1145/88616.88639
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Although prototyping has long been touted as a potentially valuable software engineering activity, it has never achieved widespread use by developers of large-scale, production software. This is probably due in part to an incompatibility between the languages and tools traditionally available for prototyping 1990 and the needs of large-scale-software developers, who must construct and experiment with large prototypes. The recent surge of interest in applying prototyping to the development of large-scale, production software will necessitate improved prototyping languages and tools appropriate for constructing and experimenting with large, complex prototype systems. We explore techniques aimed at one central aspect of prototyping that we feel is especially significant for large prototypes, namely that aspect concerned with the definition of data objects. We characterize and compare various techniques that might be useful in defining data objects in large prototypesystems, after first discussing some distinguishing characteristics of large prototype systems and identifying some requirements that they imply. To make the discussion more concrete, we describe our implementations of three techniques that represent different possibilities within the range of object definition techniques for large prototype systems. © 1990, ACM. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 699
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF COMPLEXING CONSTANT DEFINITION METHODS
    IVANOVA, TV
    IVANOV, YV
    ZUBKOV, AV
    ZHURNAL FIZICHESKOI KHIMII, 1985, 59 (10): : 2503 - 2506
  • [2] A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE AND USER ACCEPTANCE OF 2 PROTOTYPE ONLINE CATALOG SYSTEMS
    SIEGEL, ER
    KAMEEN, K
    SINN, SK
    WEISE, FO
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND LIBRARIES, 1984, 3 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [3] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF TECHNIQUES OF TRACHEAL ANASTOMOSIS IN DOGS
    VARSHNEY, AC
    KUMAR, A
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1984, 54 (05): : 469 - 472
  • [4] A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF HEURISTIC LINE BALANCING TECHNIQUES
    TALBOT, FB
    PATTERSON, JH
    GEHRLEIN, WV
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (04) : 430 - 454
  • [5] A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF 3 POST AND CORE TECHNIQUES
    HOAG, EP
    DWYER, TG
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 47 (02): : 177 - 181
  • [6] IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY IN CYTOLOGY - COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES
    DINGES, HP
    WIRNSBERGER, G
    HOFLER, H
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 1989, 11 (01): : 22 - 32
  • [7] AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIAL COUNT - COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF SOME TECHNIQUES
    ALFANO, G
    DONOFRIO, G
    MANCINI, R
    MANGO, G
    CANDIDO, A
    ROSSI, PL
    FERRARA, A
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 1982, 67 (03) : 466 - 466
  • [8] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF 3 IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ANAEROBES
    MURRAY, PR
    WEBER, CJ
    NILES, AC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1985, 22 (01) : 52 - 55
  • [9] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF ACUTE CEREBRAL VASOSPASM BY THE MICROSPHERE AND THE ANGIOGRAPHY TECHNIQUES
    ROUX, S
    CLOZEL, M
    WOLFGANG, R
    SPRECHER, U
    CLOZEL, JP
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1995, 59 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [10] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETECTION OF RINDERPEST ANTIGEN
    SELVAKUMAR, R
    PADMANABHAN, VD
    BALAPRAKASAM, RA
    INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1986, 63 (12): : 977 - 981