Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire's strengths and limitations as a practice and evaluation tool in social work

被引:1
|
作者
O'Neill, Emma [1 ]
机构
[1] Presbyterian Support Northern, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND SOCIAL WORK | 2018年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
strengths and difficulties questionnaire; social work practice; client behavioural screening; needs identification; evaluating client outcomes;
D O I
10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss2id403
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is an internationally recognised psychometric and behavioural screening tool. The Ministry of Social Development (MSD) have endorsed the SDQ as the primary behavioural screening and client outcome evaluation tool for the Social Workers in Schools (SWiS) service in 2018. The usefulness of the SDQ in social work practice and in evaluating client outcomes, however, remains unclear. This study explored two years of aggregated Youth Workers in Secondary Schools (YWiSS) SDQ scores to understand what client outcomes could be evidenced. This study further reflects on SDQs as a contractually mandated practice tool and their appropriateness in social work practice. METHOD: Data were collected from the Family Works Northern (FWN) YWiSS database. Data modelling and analysis tested what aggregated client, parent and teacher SDQ scores communicated for changes in clients' behavioural difficulties at service entry, mid-point and exit. FINDINGS: Analysis of two years of YWiSS client, parent and teacher SDQ scores aggregated at a service level provided inconsistent evidence of client need and outcomes by SDQ thematic categories. A number of factors, including the SDQ being voluntary, clients exiting service early and the challenge of asking the same teachers and parents to complete an SDQ, meant that there were very few SDQ scores completed by all parties at the service exit point, following a two-year intervention. CONCLUSION: The findings in this research suggest that the SDQ as a standalone behavioural screening and outcome evaluation tool within social work is limited. Aggregated YWiSS SDQ results provided limited insights about the complexity of client needs or any intervention outcomes to practitioners, social service providers and funders. The use of SDQ in social work requires further scrutiny to test its ability to communicate a client's level of need and any intervention outcomes to these stakeholders.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:28 / 41
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire
    Goodman, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 40 (11): : 1337 - 1345
  • [2] The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note
    Goodman, R
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1997, 38 (05): : 581 - 586
  • [3] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Nordic countries
    Obel, C
    Heiervang, E
    Rodriguez, A
    Heyerdahl, S
    Smedje, H
    Sourander, A
    Gudmundsson, OO
    Clench-Aas, J
    Christensen, E
    Heian, F
    Mathiesen, KS
    Magnússon, P
    Njaovík, U
    Koskelainen, M
    Ronning, JA
    Stormark, KM
    Olsen, J
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 13 (Suppl 2) : 32 - 39
  • [4] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Nordic countries
    Carsten Obel
    Einar Heiervang
    Alina Rodriguez
    Sonja Heyerdahl
    Hans Smedje
    André Sourander
    Ólafur O. Guðmundsson
    Jocelyne Clench-Aas
    Else Christensen
    Frode Heian
    Kristin S. Mathiesen
    Páll Magnússon
    Urður Njarðvík
    Merja Koskelainen
    John A. Rønning
    Kjell Morten Stormark
    Jørn Olsen
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2004, 13 : ii32 - ii39
  • [5] Danish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Arnfred, Jon
    Svendsen, Katrine
    Rask, Charlotte
    Jeppesen, Pia
    Fensbo, Lotte
    Houmann, Tine
    Obel, Carsten
    Niclasen, Janni
    Bilenberg, Niels
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 66 (06):
  • [6] The factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Mellor, David
    Stokes, Mark
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2007, 23 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [7] The Bifactor Model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Kobor, Andrea
    Takacs, Adam
    Urban, Robert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2013, 29 (04) : 299 - 307
  • [8] Evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Preschoolers in Urban Primary Care
    Bignall, Whitney J. Raglin
    Mara, Constance A.
    Stark, Lori J.
    Taylor, Stuart
    Herbst, Rachel B.
    McClure, Jessica M.
    Burkhardt, Mary Carol
    Ammerman, Robert T.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2023, 32 (05) : 1304 - 1317
  • [9] Evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Preschoolers in Urban Primary Care
    Whitney J. Raglin Bignall
    Constance A. Mara
    Lori J. Stark
    Stuart Taylor
    Rachel B. Herbst
    Jessica M. McClure
    Mary Carol Burkhardt
    Robert T. Ammerman
    Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2023, 32 : 1304 - 1317
  • [10] Is It Time to Revise the SDQ? The Psychometric Evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Kankaanpaa, Reeta
    Totto, Pertti
    Punamaki, Raija-Leena
    Peltonen, Kirsi
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2023, 35 (12) : 1069 - 1084