We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court-Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights.

被引：0

|

作者：

Berenson, Steve ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Thomas Jefferson Sch Law, San Diego, CA 92101 USA

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY | 2010年 / 50卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1093/ajlh/50.1.101

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：101 / 102

页数：2

相关论文

共 4 条

[1] Decision-making trends of the Rehnquist Court era: Civil rights and liberties cases
Smith, CE
Hensley, TR
[J]. JUDICATURE, 2005, 89 (03) : 161 - +
[2] Presumed Guilty: How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights.
Felker-Kantor, Max
[J]. REGISTER OF THE KENTUCKY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 120 (01) : 92 - 94
[3] FEDERAL-COURT ABSTENTION IN CIVIL-RIGHTS CASES - REHNQUIST AND THE NEW DOCTRINE OF CIVIL-RIGHTS ABSTENTION
BAIRD, BM
[J]. BUFFALO LAW REVIEW, 1994, 42 (02): : 501 - 553
[4] DIVIDED GOVERNMENT AND THE SUPREME-COURT - JUDICIAL BEHAVIOR IN CIVIL-RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES CASES, 1954-89
RICHARDSON, LE
SCHEB, JM
[J]. AMERICAN POLITICS QUARTERLY, 1993, 21 (04): : 458 - 472