Measuring quality service The use of a SERVPERF scale as an input for ELECTRE TRI multicriteria model

被引:8
|
作者
de Barros Jeronimo, Taciana [1 ]
Medeiros, Denise [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, PPGEP, Recife, PE, Brazil
关键词
SERVPERF; Customer satisfaction; Competitive strategy; ELECTRE TRI; Service quality assurance;
D O I
10.1108/IJQRM-06-2012-0095
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose a model to guide organizations according to the relative importance of customer's satisfaction about six quality service dimensions: reliability, empathy, assurance, tangibility, responsiveness (Parasuraman et al., 1985) and price. Design/methodology/approach - The present study uses SERVPERF customer requirements and weights of ELECTRE TRI multicriteria method to provide guidance on an appropriated action plan. Subsequently, it was demonstrated how the proposed model applied to the Inn. Findings - SERVPERF is based on the subjective and cognitive perception of customer's service analyses. ELECTRE TRI decreases the deviation of subjectivity and develops manager's energy flow, focussed on enterprise resources. Research limitations/implications - Measuring quality is hard work and usually the customer perceptions are not well understood, because it changes many times. In addition SERVPERF and ELECTRE TRI weights do not order the quality importance. Practical implications - Together, SERVPERF and ELECTRE TRI allow managers to prioritize the service level desired by the customer. Originality/value - The importance of this analysis follows the competitiveness approach: productivity, quality and flexibility (Boljwin and Kumpe, 1990). The paper develops an approach to lead organizational quality performance based on the customer view. It provides a sustainable competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SERVPERF model for measuring laboratory service quality through patient satisfaction
    Celap, I.
    Marijancevic, D.
    Vukasovic, I.
    Skare, V.
    Komarac, T.
    Cerfalvi, V.
    Dosen, D. Ozretic
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2022, 530 : S397 - S398
  • [2] Fuzzy ServPerf model combined with ELECTRE III to comparatively evaluate service quality of international airports in Sicily
    Lupo, Toni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 42 : 249 - 259
  • [3] Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF
    Abdullah, Firdaus
    [J]. MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2006, 24 (01) : 31 - 47
  • [4] Measuring Passenger's Perceptions of Taxi Service Quality with Weighted SERVPERF
    Yao, Zhi-gang
    Ding, Xiao-dong
    [J]. ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 97-98 : 1181 - +
  • [5] THE SERVPERF MODEL AS A SERVICE QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL IN A COMPANY
    Farronan, Emma Veronica Ramos
    Garcia, Francisco Segundo Mogollon
    Manuel, Lisseth Santur
    Moran, Isabel Cherre
    [J]. REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2020, 12 (02): : 417 - 423
  • [6] Measuring Customer Perceptions of Hotel Service Quality Based on a SERVPERF Approach
    Li, Zhihui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA TOURISM RESEARCH, 2010, 6 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [7] USE OF THE SERVPERF METHOD TO EVALUATE SERVICE QUALITY IN THE TRANSPORT COMPANY
    Ingaldi, Manuela Krystyna
    [J]. INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2016, 7 (01): : 168 - 177
  • [8] Students' perceptions of service quality in Saudi universities: the SERVPERF model
    Sohail, M. Sadiq
    Hasan, Mehedi
    [J]. LEARNING AND TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION-GULF PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 17 (01): : 54 - 66
  • [9] Influencing factors of city bus service quality based on SERVPERF model
    School of Economic and Management, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China
    不详
    [J]. Jiaotong Yunshu Xitong Gongcheng Yu Xinxi J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 2 (153-157):
  • [10] A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating Utility Theory
    Brito, Anderson J.
    de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
    Mota, Caroline M. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (03) : 812 - 821