The Impact of Not Amortizing Intangible Assets on Valuation Multiples

被引:3
|
作者
Wong, Jilnaught [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Norman [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Business Sch, Financial Accounting, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Business Sch, Dept Accounting & Finance, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Amortization; Asset management; New Zealand;
D O I
10.1108/01140580510818530
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Intangible assets comprise goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with finite and indefinite lives. Current New Zealand GAAP amortizes intangible assets on a systematic basis over their useful lives, with the proviso that the amortization period for goodwill cannot exceed 20 years. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) do not permit the periodic amortization of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives. Instead, these intangibles are subject to a periodic impairment test with any impairment recognised in profit or loss. In the absence of an impairment loss, the IFRS rule would increase earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and earnings (E), but this impact should not affect the value of the enterprise (EV) and the value of the firm's equity (P). Hence, valuation heuristics for EV/EBIT (enterprise value to EBIT) and PE (price to earnings) multiples, which are commonly used for valuations and which have evolved under the amortization rule, need to be revised downward to adjust for the IFRS-induced increase in EBIT and E. Our analysis of New Zealand companies with intangible assets indicates that the mean EV/EBIT and PE multiples with amortization of intangibles of 12.403 and 13.586, respectively, decrease to 10.971 and 12.346, respectively, without amortization of intangibles.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 93
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INTANGIBLE EXPENSES AND AMORTIZING INTANGIBLE ASSETS
    WALES, SH
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1962, 37 (01): : 96 - 98
  • [2] VALUATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS
    Pakosta, Jaroslav
    Cincalova, Simona
    Patek, Josef
    [J]. HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, VOL 7 (1), 2017, 2017, : 662 - +
  • [3] AMORTIZING INTANGIBLE ASSETS - EFFECT OF GOING CONCERN VALUE AND ABANDONMENT
    BROENEN, D
    REED, CH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TAXATION, 1976, 44 (06): : 331 - 333
  • [4] AMORTIZING INTANGIBLE ASSETS - SETTING A COST BASIS AND DETERMINABLE LIFE
    BROENEN, D
    REED, CH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TAXATION, 1976, 44 (03): : 130 - 131
  • [5] Market valuation of intangible assets
    Choi, WW
    Kwon, SS
    Lobo, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (01) : 35 - 45
  • [6] Market valuation of intangible assets
    Choi, WW
    Kwon, SS
    Lobo, GJ
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE 1998 PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 39 - 39
  • [7] The Valuation Of Intangible Assets: Where To?
    Grosu, Veronica
    Bostan, Ionel
    Socoliuc, Marian
    Mates, Dorel
    Hlaciuc, Elena
    [J]. CREATING GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES: A 360-DEGREE APPROACH, VOLS 1-4, 2011, : 774 - +
  • [8] A New Model on Intangible Assets Valuation
    Chung, Ryan P. C.
    Lai, Kin Keung
    Fu, Yelin
    [J]. 2013 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING (BIFE), 2014, : 181 - 185
  • [9] Intangible Assets: From Evaluation to Valuation
    Sequeira, Camilo Augusto
    Fernandez y Fernandez, Eloi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 907 - 916
  • [10] VALUATION PRACTICES OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS IN ESTONIA
    Pars, Maarja
    Sander, Priit
    [J]. SGEM 2015: POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, VOL II: FINANCE, ECONOMICS & TOURISM, 2015, : 549 - 556