Four-dimensional Plan Optimization for the Treatment of Lung Tumors Using Pencil-beam Scanning Proton Radiotherapy

被引:18
|
作者
Cummings, David [1 ]
Tang, Shikui [2 ]
Ichter, William [1 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Sturgeon, Jared D. [3 ]
Lee, Andrew K. [3 ]
Chang, Chang [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Ctr Proton Therapy, Phys, Irving, TX USA
[2] Texas Ctr Proton Therapy, Med Phys, Irving, TX 75063 USA
[3] Texas Ctr Proton Therapy, Radiat Oncol, Irving, TX USA
关键词
4d robust optimization; robust optimization; proton pbs treatment; interplay effect;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.3192
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of four-dimensional (4D) robust optimization for proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) treatment of lung tumors. Patients and methods In seven patients with lung cancer, proton beam therapy was planned using 4D robust optimization over 4D computed tomography (CT) data sets. The gross target volume (GTV) was contoured based on individual breathing phases, and a 5-mm expansion was used to generate the clinical target volume (cry) for each phase. The 4D optimization was conducted directly on the 4D CT data set. The robust optimization settings included a CT Hounsfield unit (HU) uncertainty of 4% and a setup uncertainty of 5 mm to obtain the CTV. Additional target dose objectives such as those for the internal target volume (ITV) as well as the organ at risk (OAR) dose requirements were placed on the average CT. For comparison, three-dimensional (3D) robust optimization was also performed on the average CT. An additional verification 4D CT was performed to verify plan robustness against inter-fractional variations. Results Target coverages were generally higher for 4D optimized plans. The difference was most pronounced for ITV V70Gy when evaluating individual breathing phases. The 4D optimized plans were shown to he able to maintain the ITV coverage at full prescription, while 3D optimized plans could not. More importantly, this difference in ITV V70Gy between the 4D and 3D optimized plans was also consistently observed when evaluating the verification 4D CT, indicating that the 4D optimized plans were more robust against inter fractional variations. Less difference was seen between the 4D and 3D optimized plans in the lungs criteria: V5Gy and V20Gy. Conclusion The proton PBS treatment plans optimized directly on the 4D CT were shown to be more robust when compared to those optimized on a regular 3D CT. Robust 4D optimization can improve the target coverage for the proton PBS lung treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust Optimization Using Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography for the Treatment of Lung Tumors in Pencil-Beam Proton Radiotherapy Planning
    Cummings, D.
    Ichter, W.
    Wang, P.
    Tang, S.
    Chang, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2994 - 2994
  • [2] Four-dimensional proton treatment planning for lung tumors
    Engelsman, M
    Rietzel, E
    Kooy, HM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (05): : 1589 - 1595
  • [3] Dosimetric Impacts of Couch Moving Rails On Proton Treatment Using Pencil-Beam Scanning
    Zhang, Y.
    Park, J.
    Blalock, J.
    Stevens, R.
    Johnson, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E880 - E881
  • [4] Pencil-beam scanning proton therapy for the treatment of glomus jugulare tumours
    Kubes, Jiri
    Vondracek, Vladimir
    Andrlik, Michal
    Navratil, Matej
    Slavikova, Silvia
    Klika, Daniel
    Haas, Alexandra
    Dedeckova, Katerina
    Kopeckova, Katerina
    Ondrova, Barbora
    Rotnaglova, Eliska
    Vinakurau, Stepan
    Grebenyuk, Alexander
    Rosina, Jozef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2022, 69 (04) : 456 - 462
  • [5] Robust optimization for IMPT of pencil-beam scanning proton therapy for prostate cancer
    Brouwer, C. L.
    Matysiak, W. P.
    Klinker, P.
    Spijkerman-Bergsma, M.
    Hammer, C.
    Van den Bergh, A. C. M.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Scandurra, D.
    Korevaar, E. W.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S835 - S836
  • [6] Clinical results and toxicities in pediatric CNS tumors treated with proton pencil-beam scanning
    Rombi, B.
    Ruggi, A.
    Ronchi, L.
    Buwenge, M.
    Ammendolia, I.
    Cammelli, S.
    Melchionda, F.
    Prete, A.
    Fracchiolla, F.
    Zucchelli, M.
    Morganti, G.
    Amichetti, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S653 - S654
  • [7] Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results
    Kubes, Jiri
    Vondracek, Vladimir
    Andrlik, Michal
    Navratil, Matej
    Slavikova, Silvia
    Vitek, Pavel
    Dedeckova, Katerina
    Prausova, Jana
    Ondrova, Barbora
    Rotnaglova, Eliska
    Lukes, Petr
    Patzelt, Matej
    Grebenyuk, Alexander
    Rosina, Jozef
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 278 (03) : 763 - 769
  • [8] Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results
    Kubeš Jiří
    Vondráček Vladimír
    Andrlik Michal
    Navrátil Matěj
    Sláviková Silvia
    Vítek Pavel
    Dědečková Kateřina
    Prausová Jana
    Ondrová Barbora
    Rotnáglová Eliška
    Lukeš Petr
    Patzelt Matěj
    Grebenyuk Alexander
    Rosina Jozef
    [J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 763 - 769
  • [9] Pencil-beam scanning proton therapy for anal cancer: a dosimetric comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Ojerholm, Eric
    Kirk, Maura L.
    Thompson, Reid F.
    Zhai, Huifang
    Metz, James M.
    Both, Stefan
    Ben-Josef, Edgar
    Plastaras, John P.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (08) : 1209 - 1217
  • [10] Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy
    Halthore, Aditya
    Fellows, Zachary
    Tran, Anh
    Deville, Curtiland, Jr.
    Wright, Jean L.
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Li, Heng
    Sheikh, Khadija
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2023, 9 (03) : 40 - 49