Managing Knowledge across Boundaries in Healthcare when Innovation is Desired
被引:0
|
作者:
Edenius, Mats
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Uppsala Univ, Dept Informat & Media, POB 513, SE-75120 Uppsala, SwedenUppsala Univ, Dept Informat & Media, POB 513, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
Edenius, Mats
[1
]
Keller, Christina
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Uppsala Univ, Dept Informat & Media, POB 513, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
Jonkoping Int Business Sch, Dept Informat, SE-55111 Jonkoping, SwedenUppsala Univ, Dept Informat & Media, POB 513, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
Keller, Christina
[1
,2
]
Lindblad, Staffan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Karolinska Inst, Med Management Ctr, SE-17177 Stockholm, SwedenUppsala Univ, Dept Informat & Media, POB 513, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
Lindblad, Staffan
[3
]
机构:
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Informat & Media, POB 513, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Jonkoping Int Business Sch, Dept Informat, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Med Management Ctr, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
The purpose of this study is to explore how knowledge can be managed across boundaries when implementing innovations in the healthcare sector is desired, in this specific case a healthcare quality register. The research is based on a qualitative, case study approach and comprises methodologies such as semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The findings of this study describe knowledge transferred across boundaries on a syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic level. On the syntactic level, knowledge of the innovation was transferred by training sessions for healthcare staff and through information to patients. On the semantic level, knowledge was transferred by knowledge brokering in the professional community of rheumatologists, and by creating collective stories and encouraging rheumatologists to "try" the innovation to find added value. On the pragmatic level, there were explicit conflicts of interest between physicians and healthcare authorities, as well as resistance from some rheumatologists to share knowledge of patients and treatment. The paper is concluded with implications for innovation practice in healthcare drawn from the study and ends with remarks about challenges ahead.
机构:
Copenhagen Business Sch, Ctr Business Dev & Management, Frederiksberg, DenmarkCopenhagen Business Sch, Ctr Business Dev & Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark