THE COSTS OF CONFLICT-RESOLUTION AND FINANCIAL DISTRESS - EVIDENCE FROM THE TEXACO-PENNZOIL LITIGATION

被引：84

作者：

CUTLER, DM

SUMMERS, LH

机构：

[1] MIT,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02139

[2] HARVARD UNIV,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138

[3] NATL BUR ECON RES,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138

来源：

RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS | 1988年 / 19卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/2555697

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：157 / 172

页数：16

共 50 条

[1] TEXACO-PENNZOIL LITIGATION
COFFMAN, JB
[J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1986, 84 (08) : 13 - 14
[2] Litigation settlements, litigation stakes, and financial distress costs
Narayanamoorthy, Ganapathi S.
Zhou, Hui
[J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 41 (03) : 459 - 483
[3] INDUSTRY EFFECTS OF INTERFIRM LAWSUITS - EVIDENCE FROM PENNZOIL V TEXACO
HERTZEL, MG
SMITH, JK
[J]. JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 1993, 9 (02): : 425 - 444
[4] LEGAL CASE PLANNING VIA THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS - LITIGATION OR CONFLICT-RESOLUTION
DORWEILER, VP
[J]. MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1987, 9 (3-5): : 251 - 261
[5] Theory and evidence on the resolution of financial distress
Brown, David T.
Ciochetti, Brian A.
Riddiough, Timothy J.
[J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2006, 19 (04): : 1357 - 1397
[6] Shareholder-Creditor Conflict and the Resolution of Financial Distress
Chu, Yongqiang
Diep-Nguyen, Ha
Wang, Jun
Wang, Wei
Wang, Wenyu
[J]. REVIEW OF CORPORATE FINANCE STUDIES, 2024,
[7] THE COSTS OF INEFFICIENT BARGAINING AND FINANCIAL DISTRESS - EVIDENCE FROM CORPORATE LAWSUITS
BHAGAT, S
BRICKLEY, JA
COLES, JL
[J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 35 (02) : 221 - 247
[8] FROM CONFLICT THEORY TO CONFLICT-RESOLUTION - CONTROLLING COLLECTIVE VIOLENCE IN PRISONS
FLYNN, EE
[J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1980, 23 (05) : 745 - 776
[9] THE EFFECTS OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYMMETRY ON CONFLICT-RESOLUTION - AN EXPERIMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
ELIAS, N
[J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1990, 65 (03): : 606 - 623
[10] A CRITIQUE OF WESTERN CONFLICT-RESOLUTION FROM A NONWESTERN PERSPECTIVE
SALEM, PE
[J]. NEGOTIATION JOURNAL-ON THE PROCESS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT, 1993, 9 (04): : 361 - 369

← 1 2 3 4 5 →