Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships with Individuals in Same-Sex Couple Relationships

被引:3
|
作者
Lafontaine, Marie-France [1 ]
Hum, Laura [1 ]
Gabbay, Nicolas [1 ]
Dandurand, Cathy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Psychol, 136 Jean Jacques Lussier, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Inst Cognit Behav Therapy, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Romantic intimacy; same-sex couples; psychometric properties; romantic attachment; relationship happiness;
D O I
10.1080/1550428X.2017.1326017
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
As a concept, romantic intimacy may be examined through Schaefer and Olson's (1981) measure, the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR), which identified five dimensions of intimacy: emotional, intellectual, recreational, sexual, and social intimacy. Moore, McCabe, and Stockdale's (1998) attempt to replicate this five-factor model was not successful, and they instead proposed a three-factor model of intimacy: engagement, communication, and shared friendships. The objective of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the PAIR with individuals involved in same-sex couple relationships using these two models. Three hundred fifty participants completed the PAIR, the Experiences in Close Relationships, and the brief 4-item version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Confirmatory factor analyses were not able to replicate both the original five-factor structure and the proposed three-factor structure of the PAIR. Rather, results supported the factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity of our revised version of Moore et al.'s (1998) three-factor model of intimacy, which retained the three dimensions after various modifications (i.e., addition of covariance terms, deletion of an item, and transference of items) were made. Links were found between these three dimensions of intimacy and insecure romantic attachment, as well as relationship happiness.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 294
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Attachment and Dyadic Forgiveness in Individuals in Same-Sex Couple Relationships
    Guzman-Gonzalez, Monica
    Bekios, Nikolas
    Burgos, Josefa
    Obregon, Camila
    Tabilo, Benjamin
    Casu, Giulia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (18)
  • [2] Assessment of Couple Relationships Standards in Same-Sex Attracted Adults
    Baker, Nicholas A.
    Halford, W. Kim
    [J]. FAMILY PROCESS, 2020, 59 (02) : 537 - 555
  • [3] Stigma and Intimacy in Same-Sex Relationships: A Narrative Approach
    Frost, David M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [4] PASSING - IMPACT ON THE QUALITY OF SAME-SEX COUPLE RELATIONSHIPS
    BERGER, RM
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK, 1990, 35 (04) : 328 - 332
  • [5] An Exploratory Study of Religiosity and Same-Sex Couple Relationships
    Rostosky, Sharon S.
    Otis, Melanie D.
    Riggle, Ellen D. B.
    Kelly, Sondra
    Brodnicki, Carolyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES, 2008, 4 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [6] PROTOTYPES OF INTIMACY AND DISTANCE IN SAME-SEX AND OPPOSITE-SEX RELATIONSHIPS
    HELGESON, VS
    SHAVER, P
    DYER, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1987, 4 (02) : 195 - 233
  • [7] INTIMACY AND STRUCTURE - SEX-DIFFERENCES IN IMAGERY OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS
    MAZUR, E
    OLVER, RR
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 1987, 16 (11-12) : 539 - 558
  • [8] SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS
    不详
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGY TODAY, 2019, 35 (04) : 29 - 29
  • [9] Minority stress experiences in committed same-sex couple relationships
    Rostosky, Sharon Scales
    Riggle, Ellen D. B.
    Gray, Barry E.
    Hatton, Roxanna L.
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2007, 38 (04) : 392 - 400
  • [10] Risk assessment of adolescents with same-sex relationships
    Udry, JR
    Chantala, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2002, 31 (01) : 84 - 92