Vegetable oil as an MR contrast agent for rectal applications

被引:3
|
作者
Pokieser, P
Schober, E
Hittmair, K
Kettenbach, J
Naude, J
Herbst, F
KarnerHanusch, J
Segel, R
Imhof, H
Kramer, J
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Vienna
[2] Department of Radiotherapy, University of Vienna, Vienna
[3] Department of Surgery, University of Vienna, Vienna
[4] Apothecary of the University Hospital, Vienna
[5] MR-Institute of the Medical Faculty, Vienna
关键词
MR; contrast enhancement; experimental; pelvis; rectum; fat suppression;
D O I
10.1016/0730-725X(95)00049-M
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of pure vegetable oil as an MR contrast agent for rectal applications. The hypothesis was that vegetable oil highlights the lumen of the rectum after rectal application as a positive contrast medium and offers additional contrast qualities using fat suppression techniques. Eleven MRI examinations were performed on 11 subjects (five healthy volunteers, all males, mean age 35 yr; and six patients, three males, three females, mean age 49 yr). Peanut oil, 200 mi, was applied rectally. In addition, 0.1 mmol/kg GD-DTPA was administered intravenously to the six patients only. Conventional T-1-weighted SE sequences and and T-1-weighted SE images with fat suppression were obtained. Criteria for image evaluation were: overall image quality; uniformity of contrast distribution; chemical shift artifact; and delineation of the rectal wall. Side effects were assessed. There were no complaints reported by the 11 subjects. The image quality was sufficient in all studies. In all five of the volunteers and five of the six patients, the distribution of oil was uniform. Chemical shift artifacts did not deteriorate image quality. After rectal application of vegetable oil, the delineation of the rectal wall was sufficient with and without fat suppression techniques. Vegetable oil highlights the lumen of the rectum in MRI studies and offers additional contrast qualities with fat suppression techniques, acting as a positive as well as a negative contrast agent, depending on the chosen sequence.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 984
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methylcellulose as a rectal contrast agent for MR imaging of rectal carcinoma
    Goh, JSK
    Goh, JPN
    Wansaicheong, GKL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (05) : 1145 - 1146
  • [2] Extracardiac applications of MR blood pool contrast agent in children
    Farmakis, Shannon G.
    Khanna, Geetika
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 44 (12) : 1598 - 1609
  • [3] Extracardiac applications of MR blood pool contrast agent in children
    Shannon G. Farmakis
    Geetika Khanna
    Pediatric Radiology, 2014, 44 : 1598 - 1609
  • [4] Redox Sensitive MR Contrast Agent
    Matsumoto, Ken-ichiro
    Nakanishi, Ikuo
    Anzai, Kazunori
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2010, 24
  • [5] Monoclonal antibody A7-superparamagnetic iron oxide as contrast agent of MR imaging of rectal carcinoma
    A Toma
    E Otsuji
    Y Kuriu
    K Okamoto
    D Ichikawa
    A Hagiwara
    H Ito
    T Nishimura
    H Yamagishi
    British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 93 : 131 - 136
  • [6] Monoclonal antibody A7-superparamagnetic iron oxide as contrast agent of MR imaging of rectal carcinoma
    Toma, A
    Otsuji, E
    Kuriu, Y
    Okamoto, K
    Ichikawa, D
    Hagiwara, A
    Ito, H
    Nishimura, T
    Yamagishi, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (01) : 131 - 136
  • [7] INHALED OXYGEN - A BRAIN MR CONTRAST AGENT
    BERTHEZENE, Y
    TOURNUT, P
    TURJMAN, F
    NGBESSO, R
    FALISE, B
    FROMENT, JC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1995, 16 (10) : 2010 - 2012
  • [8] FERRITE PARTICLES AS AN MR CONTRAST AGENT - RESPONSE
    SAINI, S
    FERRUCCI, JT
    RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (03) : 656 - 656
  • [9] ORAL HEPATOBILIARY MR IMAGING CONTRAST AGENT
    NELSON, JA
    SCHMIEDL, UP
    KASTELL, M
    ROBINSON, DH
    STARR, FL
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 187 - 187
  • [10] MR angiography with a blood pool contrast agent
    Baum, RA
    Mohler, ER
    Carpenter, JP
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 339 - 339