Introduction to philosophy for non-philosophers

被引：0
|
作者：
Alejandro, Roberto [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Filosofia & Humanidades, Letras Modernas, Cordoba, Argentina
来源：
IZQUIERDAS | 2018年 / 40卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号：
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：281 / 285
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Introduction to philosophy for non-philosophers
    Blondel, Eric
    [J]. REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LA FRANCE ET DE L ETRANGER, 2014, 139 (03): : 406 - 407
  • [2] Philosophy for non-philosophers
    Martinez Gomez, German Ivan
    [J]. COLMENA-REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DEL ESTADO DE MEXICO, 2011, (69): : 90 - 96
  • [3] Philosophy for Non-Philosophers
    Constantine, Simon
    [J]. PARALLAX, 2018, 24 (01) : 120 - 123
  • [4] Socrates for everyone. Teaching philosophy to non-philosophers
    Gabaude, JM
    [J]. REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LA FRANCE ET DE L ETRANGER, 2004, 129 (04): : 472 - 473
  • [5] Ontology treatise for non-philosophers (and philosophers)
    Chauvier, Stephane
    [J]. REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LA FRANCE ET DE L ETRANGER, 2011, 136 (02): : 292 - 293
  • [6] The implicit decision theory of non-philosophers
    Preston Greene
    Andrew J. Latham
    Kristie Miller
    Michael Nielsen
    [J]. Synthese, 203
  • [7] The implicit decision theory of non-philosophers
    Greene, Preston
    Latham, Andrew
    Miller, Kristie
    Nielsen, Michael
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2024, 203 (02)
  • [8] Correction to: The implicit decision theory of non-philosophers
    Preston Greene
    Andrew J. Latham
    Kristie Miller
    Michael Nielsen
    [J]. Synthese, 203
  • [9] Do non-philosophers think epistemic consequentialism is counterintuitive?
    Andow, James
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2017, 194 (07) : 2631 - 2643
  • [10] Do non-philosophers think epistemic consequentialism is counterintuitive?
    James Andow
    [J]. Synthese, 2017, 194 : 2631 - 2643
12345