Mega-Regional Agreements and the Struggle for Economic Order in the Asia-Pacific Region

被引:4
|
作者
Novikov, Dmitry [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shumkova, Veronika [4 ]
机构
[1] Int Lab World Order Studies, Dept Int Relat, Moscow, Russia
[2] Int Lab World Order Studies, Moscow, Russia
[3] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, New Regionalism, Moscow, Russia
[4] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Ctr Comprehens European & Int Studies, Moscow, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Asia-Pacific; international order; One Belt-One Road; trade blocs; Trans-Pacific Partnership; US-China relations;
D O I
10.1111/aspp.12429
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The U.S. withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) project in January 2017 effectively marked the end (at least-for some time) of the period of active competition between so-called "mega-regional agreements" in the Asia-Pacific region. A flagship of the Obama administration's initiatives in Asia, the TPP spurred China to intensify work on an alternative project-its Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)-and sparked an unusual wave of competition among APR institutions. Significantly, Russia joined this "partnership race" in 2016, putting forward an initiative to build a Greater Eurasian Partnership. It became something of a given that any power aspiring to regional leadership must have its own "partnership plan" to promote. At the same time, the formation and development of mega-regional partnerships is an important stage in the regionalization of the world economy and global politics and a key element of the new phenomenon of regionalization. This article examines the TPP and RCEP initiatives as attempts to form a regional international order holding some degree of autonomy from the global set of rules for the functioning of regional international systems-in this case, that of the APR.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 811
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条