ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FELODIPINE COMPARED WITH NITRENDIPINE IN MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION

被引:3
|
作者
LASSEN, E
FRIMODTMOLLER, J
AHLSTROM, F
BOGESKOVJENSEN, I
NIELSEN, MR
WICKERSNIELSEN, N
WINKEL, OP
机构
[1] Private Practices, Hadsund
[2] Private Practices, Aalborg
[3] Private Practices, Rødovre
[4] Private Practices, Slagelse
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80737-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In a double-blind study, 130 patients with hypertension were randomized to treatment with either felodipine or nitrendipine. The initial dose of 10 mg once daily was increased to 20 mg once daily and to 20 mg twice daily if the sitting diastolic blood pressure remained >90 mmHg 24 hours after a previous dose. After 6 weeks of treatment, 8 to 10 and 24 hours after dosing, and after 9 weeks of treatment, 8 to 10 hours after dosing, blood pressure was significantly lower in the felodipine group than in the nitrendipine group. The proportion of patients who responded to treatment also was higher in the felodipine group than in the nitrendipine group. Adverse events of a vasodilatory nature were more common in the patients treated with felodipine. The plasma lipid fractions were unchanged, except for a slight and clinically nonsignificant increase in cholesterol in the felodipine-treated patients. At the doses used, felodipine induced more pronounced arteriolar dilation and blood pressure reduction than nitrendipine. Lower doses of felodipine should be evaluated in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 664
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NITRENDIPINE IN THE OUTPATIENT TREATMENT OF MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    PINOL, C
    GUARDIOLA, E
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1994, 55 (10): : 1150 - 1160
  • [2] Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with amlodipine for mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Chrysant, SG
    Marbury, TC
    Robinson, TD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2003, 17 (06) : 425 - 432
  • [3] Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with amlodipine for mild-to-moderate hypertension
    S G Chrysant
    T C Marbury
    T D Robinson
    [J]. Journal of Human Hypertension, 2003, 17 : 425 - 432
  • [4] The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of irbesartan compared with amlodipine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.
    Neutel, J
    Germino, W
    Smith, D
    Park, JS
    Reilly, K
    Triscari, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 12 (04) : 128A - 128A
  • [5] AMLODIPINE COMPARED TO NITRENDIPINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    ENGLERT, R
    BERESSEM, P
    VONMANTEUFFEL, E
    STAFUNSKY, M
    KRAMAR, M
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 67 : S35 - S37
  • [6] NITRENDIPINE TREATMENT OF MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    VITACOLONNA, E
    GUAGNANO, MT
    CAPANI, F
    SENSI, S
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1986, 39 (03): : 414 - 420
  • [7] RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PARALLEL STUDY OF THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LOSARTAN POTASSIUM COMPARED WITH FELODIPINE ER IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    CHAN, JCN
    CRITCHLEY, JAJH
    LAPPE, JT
    RASKIN, SJ
    SNAVELY, D
    GOLDBERG, AI
    SWEET, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1995, 9 (09) : 765 - 771
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of spirapril in mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Hayduk, K
    Kraul, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 34 : S19 - S23
  • [9] EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ENALAPRIL IN MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    KOHAN, R
    GOREN, Y
    FRAJEWICKI, V
    RUDOY, Y
    LEIBA, M
    BENARI, J
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1988, 43 (03): : 355 - 360
  • [10] THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF A LOW-DOSE COMBINATION OF RAMIPRIL AND FELODIPINE ER IN MILD-TO-MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    BAINBRIDGE, AD
    MACFADYEN, RJ
    STARK, S
    LEES, KR
    REID, JL
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 36 (04) : 323 - 330